+1 on the first point. I've seen other issues in the past with the devtools project based on image versioning stuff.
Given devtools is more for experimental and first-steps than production usage - switching to the standalone controller seems like a good idea. On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 16:15, Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote: > this issue was opened against devtools and raises an important point: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-devtools/issues/273 > > "On a separate note, will these builds eventually be versioned or will they > continue to be tagged in a backwards incompatible way? I am trying to > create a build process that is deterministic and currently I am unable to > achieve this." > > Given that we're pointing developer to make quick start still as the way to > startup and some of the dependence in this build on docker latest (now > nightly), I think we should pin all the dependent images etc and make a > release available. > > An existential question is whether we should use the standalone controller > which is faster to startup and adapt our docs accordingly. > > Thoughts? > > -r > -- Regards, James Thomas
