Below is the list if repo with last pushed date from which we can
decide what we can keep and what can be archived. Probably repo which
have not been updated after 2017 can be archived for now

1 | incubator-openwhisk                                | 2019-07-24
2 | incubator-openwhisk-website                        | 2019-07-23
3 | incubator-openwhisk-cli                            | 2019-07-22
4 | incubator-openwhisk-runtime-swift                  | 2019-07-22
5 | incubator-openwhisk-runtime-go                     | 2019-07-20
6 | incubator-openwhisk-runtime-nodejs                 | 2019-07-18
7 | incubator-openwhisk-runtime-rust                   | 2019-07-18
8 | incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube                    | 2019-07-18
9 | incubator-openwhisk-client-js                      | 2019-07-16
10| incubator-openwhisk-runtime-python                 | 2019-07-12
11| incubator-openwhisk-devtools                       | 2019-07-11
12| incubator-openwhisk-utilities                      | 2019-07-10
13| incubator-openwhisk-release                        | 2019-07-09
14| incubator-openwhisk-catalog                        | 2019-07-08
15| incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy                      | 2019-07-05
16| incubator-openwhisk-composer                       | 2019-07-04
17| incubator-openwhisk-runtime-php                    | 2019-07-03
18| incubator-openwhisk-runtime-java                   | 2019-07-03
19| incubator-openwhisk-apigateway                     | 2019-07-01
20| incubator-openwhisk-package-alarms                 | 2019-06-29
21| incubator-openwhisk-package-cloudant               | 2019-06-29
22| incubator-openwhisk-package-kafka                  | 2019-06-29
23| incubator-openwhisk-runtime-ballerina              | 2019-06-29
24| incubator-openwhisk-runtime-dotnet                 | 2019-06-29
25| incubator-openwhisk-runtime-ruby                   | 2019-06-29
26| incubator-openwhisk-runtime-docker                 | 2019-06-29
27| incubator-openwhisk-client-go                      | 2019-06-29
28| incubator-openwhisk-pluggable-provider             | 2019-06-24
29| incubator-openwhisk-test                           | 2019-05-31
30| incubator-openwhisk-deploy-openshift               | 2019-05-20
31| incubator-openwhisk-composer-python                | 2019-03-20
32| incubator-openwhisk-external-resources             | 2019-02-10
33| incubator-openwhisk-workshop                       | 2019-01-24
34| incubator-openwhisk-package-pushnotifications      | 2019-01-08
35| incubator-openwhisk-package-deploy                 | 2018-11-07
36| incubator-openwhisk-tutorial                       | 2018-07-30
37| incubator-openwhisk-client-swift                   | 2018-05-09
38| incubator-openwhisk-deploy-mesos                   | 2018-04-16

39| incubator-openwhisk-slackinvite                    | 2017-12-29
40| incubator-openwhisk-vscode                         | 2017-11-03
41| incubator-openwhisk-package-rss                    | 2017-09-27
42| incubator-openwhisk-xcode                          | 2017-08-21
43| incubator-openwhisk-package-template               | 2017-08-17
44| incubator-openwhisk-debugger                       | 2017-07-20
45| incubator-openwhisk-sample-matos                   | 2017-07-14
46| incubator-openwhisk-playground                     | 2017-07-12
47| incubator-openwhisk-podspecs                       | 2017-07-12
48| incubator-openwhisk-client-python                  | 2017-07-10
49| incubator-openwhisk-package-jira                   | 2017-07-10
50| incubator-openwhisk-selfserve-test                 | 2017-06-26
51| incubator-openwhisk-GitHubSlackBot                 | 2017-03-16
52| incubator-openwhisk-sample-slackbot                | 2017-01-25

Chetan Mehrotra

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 3:45 AM David P Grove <gro...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> Before we request infra to rename our gitrepos (to remove incubator-), we
> should probably go through the list of our 52 repos and identify those that
> should instead be archived as obsolete.
>
> Anyone want to take a first cut at making a proposed list of repos to be
> archived?
>
> --dave

Reply via email to