We may also remove the "standalone" actionloop as now we build the proxies from 
sources.

-- 
  Michele Sciabarra
  mich...@sciabarra.com

----- Original message -----
From: Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com>
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release openwhisk-runtime-go 1.14.0
Date: Thursday, October 03, 2019 5:03 PM

I suggested in the call yesterday to remove the “loop” in the name. Is that
too much to include in this release?

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 9:43 AM Michele Sciabarra <mich...@sciabarra.com>
wrote:

> Please note that currently all the runtimes build the proxy directly from
> the sources of the master on github.
>
> I did it as a temporary workaround for the "de incubation". If we want to
> make things properly we should release first the golang runtime (without
> knative, no problem for now), then build the other runtimes using a
> released version (that did not exist at the time as the old released one
> was broken by de de-incubation and the redirect was not working)
>
> I can take care of the required PR but please first release the golang and
> provide a stable url for the sources, then I can send PR for all the others
> to use the stable and released version.
>
>
> --
>   Michele Sciabarra
>   mich...@sciabarra.com
>
> ----- Original message -----
> From: David P Grove <gro...@us.ibm.com>
> To: OpenWhisk Dev <dev@openwhisk.apache.org>
> Subject: [DISCUSS] release openwhisk-runtime-go 1.14.0
> Date: Thursday, October 03, 2019 3:28 PM
>
> I'd like to make a release of the go runtime to enable us to then make
> updated releases of all the action-loop based runtimes (including the rust
> 1.34 runtime which has never been released).
>
> I'd suggest we make this release without waiting to merge the Knative
> support PR (#106) to the go runtime. From the discussion on the technical
> interchange yesterday there may be some iteration needed to normalize
> Knative support across the various runtime projects.
>
> Any objections to proceeding with a 1.14.0 release of openwhisk-runtime-go?
> If not, I can start the process for openwhisk-runtime-go on Friday.  After
> that is done, we can then do the rest of the actionloop based runtimes
> enmasse the second half of next week.
>
> --dave
>

Reply via email to