2020-01-01 01:11:06 UTC - Rodric Rabbah: i suggest sending an email to the dev 
list with your proposed change, then have it.

all the parameters on a trigger feed creation are passed to the feed action - i 
understand you want to separately attach parameters to the trigger itself

iirc some feeds allowed you to do this by specifying a trigger payload.

if you attach parameters on the trigger itself, then you also need to define a 
precedence policy in case the feed also adds overlapping parameters.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1577841066107400?thread_ts=1577819087.106400&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-01-01 17:31:52 UTC - Bruce Adams: Whoa. And I'm mistaken. Trying a little 
experiment on IBM Cloud Functions and AWS Lambda, I get the same behavior. They 
both continue to use the warm instance after a Python exception is raised out 
of the action code.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1577899912107700?thread_ts=1577817049.105300&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-01-01 17:33:44 UTC - Bruce Adams: The function signature for `main` here 
is a little unusual, but means I can run this exact code on both OpenWhisk and 
AWS Lambda.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1577900024107900?thread_ts=1577817049.105300&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-01-01 17:35:07 UTC - Bruce Adams: Invoking this action repeatedly via the 
web user interface, the strike count continues to go up after the first failure.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1577900107108300?thread_ts=1577817049.105300&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-01-01 17:35:41 UTC - Bruce Adams: *Results:*
```{
  "error": "6 strikes! You're out!"
}```

https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1577900141108500?thread_ts=1577817049.105300&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-01-01 17:38:32 UTC - Bruce Adams: My production use of IBM Cloud Functions 
ran on periodic and other event triggers. Maybe that brought different 
behavior? Maybe there are differences in the several versions of Python base 
images? Wow. I'm confused.
confusedparrot : Bruce Adams
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1577900312108700?thread_ts=1577817049.105300&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-01-01 17:41:43 UTC - Bruce Adams: I guess the failures that I _know_ I was 
hitting were running out of resources. In one case I had a thread leak (oops) 
and in another I was leaking connections to `etcd` (creating a new connection 
on each invocation with no way to close old connections). I'm quite sure those 
warm instances were typically not reused after the failure.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1577900503108900?thread_ts=1577817049.105300&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-01-01 17:57:05 UTC - Bruce Adams: On IBM Cloud Functions, *Python 3.6.6* 
does what I want. *Python 3.7* (the current default for Python in the web UI) 
does not.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1577901425109400?thread_ts=1577817049.105300&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-01-01 17:57:32 UTC - Bruce Adams: I'm glad to know I'm not imagining what 
I saw in the past!
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1577901452109600?thread_ts=1577817049.105300&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-01-01 18:35:44 UTC - Bruce Adams: It turns out that my compliment 
yesterday needs an asterisk :eight_spoked_asterisk:. The behavior I so 
appreciate is gone in the Python 3.7 base. I can still see it in the Python 
3.3.6 base. (I chatter a bit about all of this in a thread under my yesterday 
message.) I wonder: Why this behavior change?
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1577903744112800
----
2020-01-01 18:39:40 UTC - Bruce Adams: I’m sad that I cannot use a comparison 
to OpenWhisk in my complaint to AWS about the Lambda behavior. I was very much 
looking forward to saying: _See there! OpenWhisk does the right thing!_
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1577903980113100?thread_ts=1577817049.105300&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----

Reply via email to