Will, thank you for following up on the discussion from yesterday's call.
The PRs and details shared here are very helpful (at least for me) in
understanding the contribution.

-r

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 1:20 PM Will Plusnick <pwplu...@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
> I want to start this off by apologizing for my disorganization during the
> Technical Interchange Meeting. I did a poor job of both contextualizing the
> changes and explaining what the changes were.
>
> This proposal was all about documentation. We've been discussing with
> Michele Sciabarra, Alessio Marinelli, and Alessanddro Sanino on how to best
> standardize the work we have been doing for Knative Serving compatible
> runtimes. So far these have all followed a contract defined in code, but
> otherwise not documented in an incomplete and scattered way.
>
> The following PR will attempt to take this otherwise code defined contract
> and standardize it in writing so that future implementors, users, and
> maintainers do not have to rely on piecing together code and fragmented
> mailing list discussions. Ideally the same JSON payloads outlined in the
> documentation will be implemented in the current Scala framework. For now
> though, I'm merely proposing the following markdown files to spell out what
> the existing implementations have done in code.
>
> Documentation PR: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4850
> In additon we are moving the existing example cases over to openwhisk-test
> for ease of automation in the furture:
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-test/pull/10
>

Reply via email to