Will, thank you for following up on the discussion from yesterday's call. The PRs and details shared here are very helpful (at least for me) in understanding the contribution.
-r On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 1:20 PM Will Plusnick <pwplu...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Hello all, > I want to start this off by apologizing for my disorganization during the > Technical Interchange Meeting. I did a poor job of both contextualizing the > changes and explaining what the changes were. > > This proposal was all about documentation. We've been discussing with > Michele Sciabarra, Alessio Marinelli, and Alessanddro Sanino on how to best > standardize the work we have been doing for Knative Serving compatible > runtimes. So far these have all followed a contract defined in code, but > otherwise not documented in an incomplete and scattered way. > > The following PR will attempt to take this otherwise code defined contract > and standardize it in writing so that future implementors, users, and > maintainers do not have to rely on piecing together code and fragmented > mailing list discussions. Ideally the same JSON payloads outlined in the > documentation will be implemented in the current Scala framework. For now > though, I'm merely proposing the following markdown files to spell out what > the existing implementations have done in code. > > Documentation PR: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4850 > In additon we are moving the existing example cases over to openwhisk-test > for ease of automation in the furture: > https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-test/pull/10 >