I've merged the open PRs and am awaiting a build to run some sanity checks (though I don't expect any issues).
I support releasing as v1.0.0 for two reasons: 1) I think we've reached a level of stability that warrants it 2) There are a couple of changes (ipv6 tweaks and forcing HTTP 1.1) which could be considered breaking in extreme edge cases. ------------------------------------------------ -Matt matthew.ham...@gmail.com On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:33 AM David P Grove <gro...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > There have been a few fixes and improvements since we released 0.11.0 back > in August. > Add support for preserving XF headers from upstream (#356) > Fix max body size limit (#365) > Disable ipv6 during DNS resolution (#366) > fix(http): Use HTTP 1.1 for upstreams (#369) > > I'd like to make a release so that these are available. By default this > would be 0.12.0, but we could also consider going 1.0.0. > > There are two approved PRs [1] [2] waiting to be merged since the fall. > Should these be merged before making a release? > > --dave > > [1] https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-apigateway/pull/359 > [2] https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-apigateway/pull/363 >