I've merged the open PRs and am awaiting a build to run some sanity checks
(though I don't expect any issues).

I support releasing as v1.0.0 for two reasons:
1) I think we've reached a level of stability that warrants it
2) There are a couple of changes (ipv6 tweaks and forcing HTTP 1.1) which
could be considered breaking in extreme edge cases.

------------------------------------------------
-Matt
matthew.ham...@gmail.com


On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:33 AM David P Grove <gro...@us.ibm.com> wrote:

>
> There have been a few fixes and improvements since we released 0.11.0 back
> in August.
>   Add support for preserving XF headers from upstream (#356)
>   Fix max body size limit (#365)
>   Disable ipv6 during DNS resolution (#366)
>   fix(http): Use HTTP 1.1 for upstreams (#369)
>
> I'd like to make a release so that these are available.  By default this
> would be 0.12.0, but we could also consider going 1.0.0.
>
> There are two approved PRs [1] [2] waiting to be merged since the fall.
> Should these be merged before making a release?
>
> --dave
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-apigateway/pull/359
> [2] https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-apigateway/pull/363
>

Reply via email to