I don't understand the PR - the amended headers are propagated to what HTTP
request?

-r

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:23 AM Tyson Norris <tnor...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Hi –
> One of our customers wants to reuse the transaction id when a js action
> uses the openwhisk js client to invoke another action.
> This sounds reasonable to me, but I’m not sure if there is some argument
> to keep them as separate transaction ids?
>
> There is a PR already here
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-client-js/pull/208 that I’m inclined
> to merge, but in case there is some reason to keep the transaction ids
> separate, will ask them to update the PR to make an it opt-in feature.
>
> Thanks
> Tyson
>
>

Reply via email to