I don't understand the PR - the amended headers are propagated to what HTTP request?
-r On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:23 AM Tyson Norris <tnor...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi – > One of our customers wants to reuse the transaction id when a js action > uses the openwhisk js client to invoke another action. > This sounds reasonable to me, but I’m not sure if there is some argument > to keep them as separate transaction ids? > > There is a PR already here > https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-client-js/pull/208 that I’m inclined > to merge, but in case there is some reason to keep the transaction ids > separate, will ask them to update the PR to make an it opt-in feature. > > Thanks > Tyson > >