Ah, I had no idea about [1].

I tried to commit my key in the KEYS file, but I get the following error:

$ svn ci KEYS
Sending        KEYS
Transmitting file data .svn: E195023: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: E195023: Changing file 
'/Users/alex/Work/code/nui/openwhisk-release/stagingArea/svn_release/KEYS' is 
forbidden by the server
svn: E175013: Access to '/repos/dist/!svn/txr/40740-yd5/release/openwhisk/KEYS' 
forbidden
svn: E195023: Your commit message was left in a temporary file:
svn: E195023:    
'/Users/alex/Work/code/nui/openwhisk-release/stagingArea/svn_release/svn-commit.tmp'

[1] 
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/release_manager_setup.md

Cheers,
Alex
________________________________
From: David P Grove <gro...@us.ibm.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 13:51
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org <dev@openwhisk.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Upcoming wskdebug release 1.3

There perhaps should be a cross-reference somewhere.  There is a separate
document on "first time" setup for a release manager [1] that talks about
setting up the signing infrastructure.

--dave

[1]
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/release_manager_setup.md

Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote on 07/28/2020 04:02:21 PM:

> From: Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> Date: 07/28/2020 04:03 PM
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Upcoming wskdebug release 1.3
>
> We may have one more step missing. Did you add your key to the KEYS file?
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>
u=https-3A__github.com_apache_openwhisk-2Drelease_blob_master_docs_release-5Fmanager-5Fsetup.md-23publish-2Dyour-2Dpublic-2Dkey-2Dto-2Dthe-2Dproject-2Dkeys-2Dfile&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-

> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
>
apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=5yYlLexRbv7o17SqJWk5sqD8oqfhO0BxPlMSlwGEeTQ&s=DEIrPdMPA-

> AMmYjPFPbmxd4V_dhoNMgol_GBLjmQ5Wg&e=
>
> I don't see your key here [1] and hence cannot verify the signature on
the
> release tarball yet.
>
> -r
>
> [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>
u=https-3A__dist.apache.org_repos_dist_release_openwhisk_KEYS&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-

> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
>
apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=5yYlLexRbv7o17SqJWk5sqD8oqfhO0BxPlMSlwGEeTQ&s=bh5ri0GNNeTDz1zGKVz9TyljGlx5_6jitnUB10CjOIM&e=

>
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 3:59 PM Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Alex for noting these gaps!
> >
> > -r
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 3:20 PM Alexander Klimetschek
> > <aklim...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> FWIW, I reported all these as issues (and the gen-release-vote.py one
was
> >> already reported):
> >>
> >>   *   https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>
u=https-3A__github.com_apache_openwhisk-2Drelease_issues_342&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-

> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
>
apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=5yYlLexRbv7o17SqJWk5sqD8oqfhO0BxPlMSlwGEeTQ&s=0X2YrKQ2PzjQzh1T3cxnOuoC-

> Hjwbv-tq16Od76Qbs8&e=
> >>   *   <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>
u=https-3A__github.com_apache_openwhisk-2Drelease_issues_341&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-

> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
>
apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=5yYlLexRbv7o17SqJWk5sqD8oqfhO0BxPlMSlwGEeTQ&s=QXc0D7V-

> OqjOfS_iRm-PnPg1PmKFiMWNZnWoHNuO2fo&e= >
> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>
u=https-3A__github.com_apache_openwhisk-2Drelease_issues_341&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-

> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
>
apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=5yYlLexRbv7o17SqJWk5sqD8oqfhO0BxPlMSlwGEeTQ&s=QXc0D7V-

> OqjOfS_iRm-PnPg1PmKFiMWNZnWoHNuO2fo&e=
> >>   *   https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>
u=https-3A__github.com_apache_openwhisk-2Drelease_issues_340&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-

> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
>
apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=5yYlLexRbv7o17SqJWk5sqD8oqfhO0BxPlMSlwGEeTQ&s=aPDAPENChIZOfT791CZmQAHaEUL6spc6LK4yz2i1qSg&e=

> >>   *   https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>
u=https-3A__github.com_apache_openwhisk-2Drelease_issues_317&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-

> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
>
apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=5yYlLexRbv7o17SqJWk5sqD8oqfhO0BxPlMSlwGEeTQ&s=_dCdteTNUVXpRtmP6i04Ry3FplUFE9-9SZNxLEjaG9c&e=

> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Alex
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Alexander Klimetschek <aklim...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 11:47
> >> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org <dev@openwhisk.apache.org>
> >> Subject: Re: Upcoming wskdebug release 1.3
> >>
> >> Also: the ./gen-release-vote.py script assumes a certain naming
> >> convention for cloning the https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/
> url?
>
u=https-3A__github.com_apache_openwhisk-2Drelease&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-

> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
>
apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=5yYlLexRbv7o17SqJWk5sqD8oqfhO0BxPlMSlwGEeTQ&s=xE88inHjGL1_2DswT9SqqAY8xCm1gZK47_nheoQt4c0&e=

> >> repo:
> >>
> >>   *   remote "upstream": for the actual repo
> >>   *   remote "origin" (or anything): for ones local fork
> >>
> >> In my case I had no fork and just "origin" for the actual repo,
resulting
> >> in this error:
> >>
> >>     subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['git', 'show-ref',
'--hash',
> >> '--abbrev', '--', 'refs/remotes/upstream/master']' returned non-zero
exit
> >> status 1
> >>
> >> I quickly fixed it by changing the script at [1] to use "origin".
> >>
> >> Not sure what the best solution is, I guess everyone has a different
> >> approach with forks vs. not. But maybe make it configurable and print
a
> >> hint if the git show-ref returns an error?
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>
u=https-3A__github.com_apache_openwhisk-2Drelease_blob_master_tools_gen-2Drelease-2Dvote.py-23L88&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-

> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
>
apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=5yYlLexRbv7o17SqJWk5sqD8oqfhO0BxPlMSlwGEeTQ&s=KTgQbiwC14veRFjo6r9SKX0AlduuEffLO-

> zE_LrFk2o&e=
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Alex
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Alexander Klimetschek <aklim...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> >> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 21:17
> >> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org <dev@openwhisk.apache.org>
> >> Subject: Re: Upcoming wskdebug release 1.3
> >>
> >> Few things I noticed so far while prepping the release based on [1]:
> >>
> >>   1.  It mentions "Start a [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list proposing
the
> >> release" but I rarely see this happening in practice. How strictly is
it
> >> required if nobody else is working on the same codebase?
> >>   2.  Not really clear what to do _before_ the release signing (if you
> >> missed those, you have to redo the whole procedure...)
> >>      *   npm: release version in package.json
> >>      *   CHANGELOG
> >>   3.  No link to PGP key management instructions (e.g. to upload
> >> fingerprint on id.apache.org). I eventually found this to be helpful
[2].
> >>   4.  No link to Apache Rat which it says to run manually.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>
u=https-3A__github.com_apache_openwhisk-2Drelease_blob_master_docs_release-5Finstructions.md&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-

> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
>
apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=5yYlLexRbv7o17SqJWk5sqD8oqfhO0BxPlMSlwGEeTQ&s=r829NF4wV0AxhJRVKbta-

> ypxktrKoPXhX2kEuBUuoCo&e=
> >> [2]
> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>
u=https-3A__infra.apache.org_new-2Dcommitters-2Dguide.html-23set-2Dup-2Dsecurity-2Dand-2Dpgp-2Dkeys&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-

> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
>
apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=5yYlLexRbv7o17SqJWk5sqD8oqfhO0BxPlMSlwGEeTQ&s=WoGsaXWcJxbW175DtTeLlf_xWCKLzq1yVVpd3qunQIs&e=

> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Alex
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 08:27
> >> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org <dev@openwhisk.apache.org>
> >> Subject: Re: Upcoming wskdebug release 1.3
> >>
> >> I reviewed and merged your PR. Instructions link you found is the
correct
> >> starting point. If you find something that isn’t clear please use the
> >> opportunity to improve the docs 🙏🏼
> >>
> >> -r
> >>
> >> > On Jul 22, 2020, at 11:24 AM, Alexander Klimetschek
> >> <aklim...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi fellow committers,
> >> >
> >> > I want to start the wskdebug 1.3 release soon. Two asks/questions:
> >> >
> >> > 1. would love to get reviews for the last remaining PR [1] so that I
> >> can merge it
> >> > 2. will then try to start the release process myself. instructions
at
> >> [2] are the ones to follow, right?
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>
u=https-3A__github.com_apache_openwhisk-2Dwskdebug_pull_76&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-

> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
>
apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=5yYlLexRbv7o17SqJWk5sqD8oqfhO0BxPlMSlwGEeTQ&s=L4rZ2Pdl8PFQXLXpNeDDgFYMxFViDb4nyb1fT9oQPc4&e=

> >> > [2]
> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>
u=https-3A__github.com_apache_openwhisk-2Drelease_blob_master_docs_release-5Finstructions.md&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-

> siA1ZOg&r=Fe4FicGBU_20P2yihxV-
>
apaNSFb6BSj6AlkptSF2gMk&m=5yYlLexRbv7o17SqJWk5sqD8oqfhO0BxPlMSlwGEeTQ&s=r829NF4wV0AxhJRVKbta-

> ypxktrKoPXhX2kEuBUuoCo&e=
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Alex
> >>
> >

Reply via email to