2020-10-22 09:20:30 UTC - Dominic Kim: We are using Pinpoint for the 
distributed tracing.
<https://github.com/pinpoint-apm/pinpoint>
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1603358430124500?thread_ts=1603305421.116300&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-10-22 09:21:01 UTC - Dominic Kim: @seonghyun contributed the Akka-http 
plugin and OpenWhisk plugin to the Pinpoint project.
<https://github.com/pinpoint-apm/pinpoint/tree/master/plugins>
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1603358461124700?thread_ts=1603305421.116300&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-10-22 09:21:52 UTC - Dominic Kim: We are internally maintaining the 
plugins but not quite sure they work well with the latest OpenWhisk codes.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1603358512125100?thread_ts=1603305421.116300&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-10-22 09:23:00 UTC - Dominic Kim: Since Pinpoint is based on bytecode 
intsrumentation, it might not work if the traced codes are updated.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1603358580125500?thread_ts=1603305421.116300&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-10-22 09:23:47 UTC - Dominic Kim: It would be great to check and update 
those plugins to make them work with OpenWhisk 1.0.0.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1603358627125700?thread_ts=1603305421.116300&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-10-22 09:25:28 UTC - Dominic Kim: This issue was one of the reasons why I 
implemented the new scheduler. This issue is especially more problematic when 
you have the limited(fewer) numbers of invokers.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1603358728125900?thread_ts=1603305061.114600&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-10-22 09:26:09 UTC - Dominic Kim: Before having the scheduler, we tried to 
separate the heavy-workloads functions with the others as a fallback.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1603358769126100?thread_ts=1603305061.114600&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-10-22 09:26:55 UTC - Dominic Kim: So that frequenty actions are invoked on 
a kind of "dedicated" invokers while the others are sharing the same invokers.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1603358815126300?thread_ts=1603305061.114600&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-10-22 09:27:38 UTC - Dominic Kim: But it's just a naive and transient 
approach and has many pitfalls..
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1603358858126500?thread_ts=1603305061.114600&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-10-22 12:12:25 UTC - Pavel Kravchenko: Excellent. Thank you very much.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1603368745126800?thread_ts=1602582237.064000&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-10-22 12:14:27 UTC - Pavel Kravchenko: Is there twitter provider for 
Openwhisk? To register and fire trigger on each tweet.
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1603368867128200?thread_ts=1603368867.128200&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-10-22 14:41:00 UTC - Rodric Rabbah: not that i know of
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1603377660128300?thread_ts=1603368867.128200&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-10-22 17:25:58 UTC - Brendan Doyle: hmm I'll message you to pick your 
brain on this on how you managed to separate the heavy workloads. Was it just 
renaming functions or bringing up and down invokers?

But yea this is our biggest issue hence why I can hardly wait for the scheduler 
:wink:
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1603387558128500?thread_ts=1603305061.114600&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----
2020-10-22 22:20:40 UTC - parichehr vahidinia: @Dave Grove I edited 
invoker-pod.yaml as follows:                                                    
                                                                           
`-name:"CONFIG_whisk_containerProxy_timeouts_idleContainer"                  
value{{.Values.whisk.containerProxy.timeouts.idleContainer }}`                  
             and values.yaml as follows:
```whisk:
  containerProxy:
    timeouts:
      idleContainer: "3minutes"```
but still the idle-container value is 10 minutes
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1603405240129100?thread_ts=1603306004.118000&cid=C3TPCAQG1
----

Reply via email to