I used the CMS to make the drill site last summer. It was a real pain in my
experience and I would recommend just doing the svn thing. It would be a
lot easier for debugging the site on your own machine/server and just
pushing it all at once. It also allows you to pick when you want to have
discrete commits. While the CMS is supposed to track changes I was confused
by the publishing/versioning model.

-Jason Altekruse


On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:

> Apache has two options for web sites: CMS and svnpubsub [1]. Anyone have
> any insight which we should? It’s a reasonable assumption that we want a
> basic web site, with a minimal amount of effort.
>
> Julian
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html

Reply via email to