+1 for release without Java code.
Thanks
Prasanth
> On Jan 15, 2016, at 1:14 PM, Aliaksei Sandryhaila <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1 on version 1.0.0.
>
> Of all currently open bugs (except ORC-8), only ORC-7 looks like it needs a
> fix before making a release. Unfortunately, the earliest I can only work on
> it is the next week.
>
> Aliaksei.
>
>
> On 01/15/2016 12:49 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>> Ok, based on your feedback, I'd like to make a release with just the C++
>> code. I'll volunteer as Release Manager. A couple of questions:
>>
>>
>> 1. Which number should we use? I'd propose 1.0.0.
>> 2. Any blocker bugs? I'm going to tackle ORC-8 today because I believe
>> it is a blocker not supporting compression in the file-metadata command.
>>
>> Let's aim for a quick turn around and get a release candidate on Monday.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> Owen
>>
>
