Ok, let's try CTR for now. Obviously we can switch back later if it doesn't work out for us.
Thanks Alan & Prasanth, Owen On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Prasanth J <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for CTR. > > I think we should at least wait for +1 from pre-commit test run before > commit so that we won’t break any tests or build. > > Thanks > Prasanth > > > On May 31, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1, ORC is a small enough project (both in terms of number of > contributors and code base) that CTR makes the most sense. > > > > Alan. > > > >> On May 28, 2016, at 23:02, Owen O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> All, > >> While most of the Hadoop ecosystem projects including ORC work with a > >> review-then-commit (RTC) process model, other Apache projects use > >> commit-then-review (CTR) processes. However, as a small project, I think > >> that we would be better served with CTR. What do other people think? > >> > >> .. Owen > > > >
