I did test with rc1, but I didn’t have the proper java packages installed. Once I resolved that it builds fine with java.
+1. Alan. > On Jun 3, 2016, at 21:42, Owen O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hmm, Did you test rc0 or rc1? With rc1, I tried changing the Docker file > for centos7 to install the java 8 compiler and it worked fine. > > diff --git docker/centos7/Dockerfile docker/centos7/Dockerfile > index 22b3dd0..9ef8883 100644 > --- docker/centos7/Dockerfile > +++ docker/centos7/Dockerfile > @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ RUN yum install -y \ > gcc-c++ \ > gettext-devel \ > git \ > - java-1.7.0-openjdk \ > - java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel \ > + java-1.8.0-openjdk \ > + java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel \ > make \ > maven \ > openssl-devel \ > > Can you create a Dockerfile where the compilation fails? > > Thanks, > Owen > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote: > >> One issue I saw was that it won’t build the Java side with JDK 1.8. It >> builds fine with 1.7. We should probably fix this before releasing. >> >> Alan. >> >>> On Jun 2, 2016, at 11:51, Owen O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I've rolled Apache ORC 1.1.0 release candidate 0 and I'd like to release >>> it. It is the first release with the Java reader and writer included. >>> Please check it out and vote whether we should release it. >>> >>> Artifacts: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/orc-1.1.0/ >>> Git tag: https://github.com/apache/orc/releases/tag/release-1.1.0rc0 >>> >>> Voting will conclude in 72 hours. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Owen >> >>
