Sounds like a good idea. Should we do the same for Java reader, Owen?
> On Mar 28, 2019, at 8:50 PM, Yurui Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi guys:
>
> Currently ORC have LongVectorBatch as the only representation for primitive
> integer types like boolean, byte, int and long. This is not very benefitial
> for memory usage and computation efficiency. I would like to introduce INT
> and BYTE vector batch in ORC C++ version for types like boolean, byte and
> int to improve the memory efficiency. This change would also potential
> benefits for data consumer in case of SIMD computation.
> Let me know if you have any thoughts/suggestions.
>
> Thanks
> Yurui
>
> from Alimail macOS
