Got it!

Bests,
Dongjoon.

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 16:25 Owen O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you, Dongjoon.
>
> I took sometime this morning and didn't see what was going wrong. I think
> for right now, I'll finalize this release and we can roll a follow up when
> we find and fix the problem. I believe the 1.5.6rc1 is actually better for
> most users than 1.5.5.
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:06 PM Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you, Owen.
> >
> > Yes, I know that ORC-498 resolved the two NN operations issue and the
> code
> > is directly related to this area.
> >
> > First of all, I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORC-525 for
> > the
> > observed situation as a `Major` issue (not a blocker).
> >
> > I built/installed/tested new ORC with OracleJDK8/AdoptOpenJDK8 on two
> > MacBooks multiple times.
> > (and AdoptOpenJDK11 additionally)
> >
> > The failure consistently happens with Apache Spark master(3.0.0) at
> > `SQLQuerySuite`.
> >
> > Interestingly, the corresponding test suite in Apache Spark
> > branch-2.4(2.4.4) doesn't fail consistently.
> >
> > Instead, ORC 1.5.6 might reopen the flaky issue (SPARK-26427: closed with
> > ORC 1.5.4) instead at `branch-2.4`.
> >
> > Bests,
> > Dongjoon.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:05 PM Owen O'Malley <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Dongjoon,
> > >   If you need more time, I can hold off. For resource leakage, I'd be
> > > worried about ORC-498. I tried to make sure things didn't leak, but
> that
> > > was the change that was sharing a file handle between the ReaderImpl
> and
> > > the RecordReaderImpl so that we didn't end up with two NN operations
> when
> > > reading a file.
> > >
> > > .. Owen
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 8:51 PM Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, All.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, but Apache ORC 1.5.6-rc1 seems to have a regression.
> > > > Unlike Apache ORC 1.5.5, resource leakage are observed during Apache
> > > Spark
> > > > sql module unit tests.
> > > >
> > > > I've been spending time to retest this to make it sure.
> > > > Could you give me more time?
> > > >
> > > > Bests,
> > > > Dongjoon.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 8:50 PM Owen O'Malley <
> [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > With three +1's the vote passes. I'll finalize the release. Thanks,
> > > Alan
> > > > > and Deepak!
> > > > >
> > > > > .. Owen
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Jun 26, 2019, at 20:25, Deepak Majeti <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > > - checked checksum and signature
> > > > > > - built from tar in release mode
> > > > > > - ran unit tests
> > > > > > - ran rat checks
> > > > > > - was able to generate a package
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 5:16 PM Alan Gates <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> +1.  Checked the LICENSE and NOTICE files, did a build, ran the
> > unit
> > > > > >> tests.  On the Java side did a build with a clean repo and ran
> > RAT.
> > > > (I
> > > > > >> don't know how to run RAT on the C++ side but it would be good
> to
> > > > > somehow
> > > > > >> make the same license checks.)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> One small nit, the copyright date in NOTICE is way out of date
> > > (2015).
> > > > > I
> > > > > >> already updated it in both master and branch-1.5 so it should be
> > > fixed
> > > > > for
> > > > > >> future releases.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Alan.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 9:31 PM Owen O'Malley <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> All,
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Should we release the following artifacts as ORC 1.5.6?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> tar: http://home.apache.org/~omalley/orc-1.5.6/
> > > > > >>> tag:
> https://github.com/apache/orc/releases/tag/release-1.5.6rc1
> > > > > >>> jiras:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ORC/versions/12345170
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Thanks!
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > > Deepak Majeti
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to