expxiaoli opened a new pull request #971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/971


   …ng encoding columns
   
   In old code, when dictionary string encoding columns are read by vectorized 
reading, 2 copy of current stripe's dictionary data and 1 copy of next stripe's 
dictionary data are hold in memory when reading across different stripes. That 
could make vectorized reading's memory usage is larger than row reading. This 
patch fixes this issue, and only hold 1 copy of current stripe's dictionary 
data.
   
   This patch logic has 3 parts:
   
   1) Directly read data to primitive byte array, rather than using 
DynamicByteArray as intermediate variable. Using DynamicByteArray as 
intermediate variable causes 2 copy of current stripe's dictionary data are 
hold in memory.
   
   2) Lazy read dictionary data until read current batch data. In previous 
code, RecordReaderImpl class's nextBatch method reads dictionary data of next 
stripe through advanceToNextRow method, then memory will hold two stripe's 
dictionary data. Through lazy read logic, only one stripe's dictionary data is 
hold in memory when reading across different stripes.
   
   3) Before lazy read dictionary data from current stripe, remove batch data's 
reference to dictionary data from previous stripe. This could allow GC to clean 
previous stripe's dictionary data memory.
   
   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. File a JIRA issue first and use it as a prefix of your PR title, e.g., 
`ORC-001: Fix ABC`.
     2. Use your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes instead of 
describing the problem.
     3. Make PR title and description complete because these will be the 
permanent commit log.
     4. If possible, provide a concise and reproducible example to reproduce 
the issue for a faster review.
     5. If the PR is unfinished, use GitHub PR Draft feature.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@orc.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to