+1 for the release.

As for  ORC-1343 (Ignore orc.create.index), we need more careful
implementation to avoid any issue in reader & writer. This is not an urgent
issue in the current release.
BTW, I am very willing to re-implement it in the next release.

Thanks,
Deshan Xiao

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 1:43 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> In the previous email, the following was a typo. 1.8.2 and 1.7.9 are the
> correct versions which I wanted to mention.
> ```
> - Implementing is not the scope of urgent 1.8.1 and 1.7.7 releases.
> + Implementing is not the scope of urgent 1.8.2 and 1.7.9 releases.
> ```
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 9:29 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you, Pavan.
> >
> > 1. Yes, it's intentional. First, we cannot remove the added public API.
> > That's the main reason why we couldn't revert the commit physically. This
> > discussion happended on the original PR. Second, we keep the added test
> > case by marking 'ignored' because we want to re-enable the test case when
> > the feature is ready later.
> >
> > 2. Yes, right. Implementing is not the scope of urgent 1.8.1 and 1.7.7
> > releases. It's not s blocker for these releases because there is no
> reader
> > implementation before. We are open for implementng that missing features
> in
> > new releases. Feel free to make a PR if you are interested.
> >
> > Dongjoon
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 8:30 PM Pavan Lanka <pla...@apple.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I wanted to follow up on ORC-1343 (Ignore orc.create.index).
> >> * The discussion in the Jira seems to indicate that we want to revert
> >> ORC-1283, but the included changes are not a full revert, was that
> >> intentional?
> >> * I think any files created with the previous version of the writer with
> >> index as false and row_index_stride > 0 will continue to fail during
> read,
> >> didn’t we need to fix that? I do see that the scope is limited with
> >> ORC-1283 coming in to 1.7.7 and 1.8.1
> >>
> >> Please clarify.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Pavan
> >>
> >> > On Jan 16, 2023, at 1:47 PM, William H. <williamhy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ORC version
> >> 1.7.8.
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ORC 1.7.8
> >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >> >
> >> > TAG:
> >> > https://github.com/apache/orc/releases/tag/v1.7.8-rc0
> >> >
> >> > RELEASE FILES:
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/orc/v1.7.8-rc0
> >> >
> >> > STAGING REPOSITORY:
> >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheorc-1065
> >> >
> >> > LIST OF ISSUES:
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ORC/versions/12352724
> >> > https://github.com/apache/orc/milestone/14
> >> >
> >> > This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > William
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to