Thank you all!

This vote passed. I'll conclude this vote.

Dongjoon.

On 2025/05/06 18:42:31 Pavan Lanka wrote:
> +1
> 
> Verified Build and Test
> * Linux
> * JDK 17
> 
> > On May 6, 2025, at 2:47 AM, Shaoyun Chen <c...@apache.org> wrote:
> > 
> > +1
> > 
> > William H. <williamhy...@gmail.com> 于2025年5月5日周一 04:04写道:
> >> 
> >> +1
> >> 
> >> Thank you Dongjoon!
> >> 
> >> On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 10:02 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> +1
> >>> 
> >>> I verified the following.
> >>> 
> >>> - Source tarball (shasum and GPG signature)
> >>> - Java/C++ unit tests passed on the following environment
> >>>  * Debian 11 and 12
> >>>  * Ubuntu 22.04 and 24.04
> >>>  * Fedora 37
> >>>  * OracleLinux 9
> >>>  * Amazon Linux 2023
> >>>  * MacOS 13, 14, and 15
> >>> - Integration tests with Apache Spark 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT
> >>> 
> >>> The release manager checklist is here.
> >>> 
> >>> - https://github.com/apache/orc/issues/2211
> >>> 
> >>> Dongjoon
> >>> 
> >>> On 2025/05/04 12:09:31 Gang Wu wrote:
> >>>> +1
> >>>> 
> >>>> Thanks Dongjoon!
> >>>> 
> >>>> On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 11:09 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ORC version
> >>>>> 2.0.5. This vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a
> >>> majority +1
> >>>>> PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ORC 2.0.5
> >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> TAG:
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/orc/releases/tag/v2.0.5-rc0
> >>>>> (commit: a5988e6a07ea0343aed7be6d5a568d76cf9db432)
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> RELEASE FILES:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/orc/v2.0.5-rc0
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> STAGING REPOSITORY:
> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheorc-1097
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> LIST OF ISSUES:
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ORC/versions/12355829
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/orc/milestone/42?closed=1
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Dongjoon.
> >>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to