I remember when our original design goal of the repository was as a
separate process. The reason for this was that your data could be
available even when you weren't running Chandler. Also, from Chandler's
perspective, accessing the repository, whether or not it was local was
the same, which was an advantage of Kiosk mode. However, this was in the
days when we contemplated "true sharing" instead of our current model of
"import/export" (with the possibility of data loss in a round trip
webdav transport).
John
Andi Vajda wrote:
Heikki Toivonen wrote:
While this is certainly nice, I think our real goal is
getting to the
stage where the repository runs as a separate process on the
local
system and possibly also remotely. I don't know if it would
be possible
to store that onto a USB or other device.
heh, I didn't even realize the out-of-process repository was a goal!
That
does obviously change things.
No, it is not a goal, just a possibility in some configurations, but
definitely not something we're aiming at for the normal case.
Andi..
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
