Excellent, Andi. Does anyone have an objection to me making
exclusive-access the default for Chandler?
On Mar 2, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Andi Vajda wrote:
For various reasons we don't want the user to be able to run multiple
instances of Chandler against the same repository. For example, if
you fire up two instances at the same time, one of them will complain
that //Schema already exists, and there are other places where things
don't quite work. So I was wondering if anyone had an idea for a
cross-platform way to prevent multiple concurrent instances accessing
a repository. Chandler could look for and create a lock file next to
the repository directory, and place its process ID in there, thereby
allowing it to detect whether an existing lock file is obsolete
because a previous instance died without removing it. (Does Windows
have the notion of PID?) This method leaves the repository itself
out of it -- purely an application level function. Or we could get
the repository involved and have it keep track of which process has
it open, and the application layer asks the repository. I guess I
would lean toward the former method.
I'm sure there must be some python module that does this already, in
a cross-platform way...
This is an old problem that I fixed a few months ago. If you don't
want multiple Chandlers to run concurrently, start the first one with
-x or --exclusive.
Andi..
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev