On Jun 28, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
Hi Jeffrey,
The spec looks good, and I'm comfortable with the overall design.
The diagrams were indeed useful, btw.
A couple of comments...
> If the user changes any of the following fields: title,
location, ...
The set of fields here is not limited to calendar event attributes,
but applies to attributes from any stamp as well (and also the
stamp itself). You might want to be careful here, as Andi pointed
out, it won't necessarily apply to *every* attribute.
> At first glance, this might seem a little drastic. OK, at second
> glance it looks that way, too ...
I'm also concerned about this API. Did you consider using some
variant of the value model pattern?
<http://st-www.cs.uiuc.edu/users/brant/papers/ValueModel/
ValueModels.htm>
<http://c2.com/ppr/vmodels.html>
Also, what kind of coordination are you expecting from me vis-a-vis
query support?
Ted
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
