Alec Flett wrote: > Recurrence is really part of the Calendar and the filename split is > really just to break apart the logic within the module. Ideally we'd > have osaf.pim.calendar.CalendarEventMixin, > osaf.pim.calendar.RecurrenceRuleSet, and so forth. Is there an obvious
+1 > On a related note, why osaf.pim? why not just "chandler"? I'm guessing > the argument is that you could reuse these objects outside of chandler, > which seems nice.. though even the osaf prefix seems superfluous to me.. I don't like chandler for that, because then many people would have 3 nested chandler directories: cd ~ mkdir chandler cd chandler # my workdir svn co ... chandler cd chandler # svn chandler dir cd chandler # current osaf dir Oh, there's also chandler SVN repository. I'd go crazy... But yeah, I'd be interested in learning if osaf.pim could be shortened further. -- Heikki Toivonen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
