Andi Vajda wrote: >> We wouldn't have the bug nor this discussion if we could do nothing. It >> all started because the end-user release did not have all the same tests >> and tools that you get with dev release or when you build chandler >> yourself. QA and testers needs them. Parcel developers need them. > > That is a worthwhile conversation to have but I thought you had > suggested getting rid of the debug bits distribution. What you're > suggesting above doesn't require us getting rid of the debug bits > distribution.
I am not suggesting anything above. I am stating a fact. But as a potential response to the need I suggested[1] getting rid of dev release (and putting all dev tools into release), and it is one of the items on the ballot[2,3]. [1] http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/dev/2005-November/004378.html [2] http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/dev/2005-November/004423.html [3] Describe 4a and 4b: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/dev/2005-November/004439.html -- Heikki Toivonen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
