+1 Bryan Stearns wrote: > I've been kicking this idea around in my head, and looking at the 0.7 > summary-table spec has prompted me to send it to the list... > > We've currently got a summary Table implementation based on wx's Grid > mechanism; it provides a framework for presenting a list of items in > rows & columns, with scrolling support, hit testing, etc. It also comes > with some architectural structure (most in my face, the editor/renderer > mechanism) that constrains our implementation a little; our thinking > occasionally stumbles over UI issues like sections, etc, that don't > naturally fall out of using the wx Grid. > > In thinking about future needs for the table, it occurred to me that > we've already got the CollectionCanvas that knows how to present items > of varying geometry on a variably-sized canvas with scrolling, dragging, > and hit-testing. It seems like it'd give us more flexibility in evolving > the summary view in the future. (As a bonus, it already uses David's > header widget.) > > So: should we think about building the 0.7 summary table on top of > CollectionCanvas instead of the Grid? > > ...Bryan > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
