Andi Vajda wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, John Anderson wrote:
Hi:
I was reviewing the flickr parcel with Ted. We noticed:
application.dialogs.Util.ok(wx.GetApp().mainFrame, _(u"Flickr
Error"), errText)
The wx.GetApp().mainFrame seemed awkward. Not only should it not
necessary, the Util routine should use NULL internally instead of the
mainFrame.
However, wx already has methods for simple dialogs like Ok, Cancel,
etc. which take the form:
wxMessageBox(errText, _(u"Flickr Error"), wx.OK)
I was suggesting to Ted that that the native wx routines were about
as simple as any wrapper routines we could write so I would prefer to
get rid of the wrappers. Ted on the otherhand thought that for simple
parcels you shouldn't need to know any wx so the wrapper routines
were appropriate.
So I thought I'd ask for opinions on which option other people prefer.
I think that exposing wx as a public API is a bad idea, it should just
be an implementation detail.
Does that mean for every wx routine that a parcel writer could use use
we have to implement a wrapper routine? That's potentially a large
portion of wx.
Andi..
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
