This looks better, but I also find suspicious the number of downloads of 0.4 and earlier versions on all platforms, but especially on the Mac. How are people finding those links, why are they downloading 1-2 yr. old versions of the product? If these numbers are script artifacts, maybe we could fix that too? If they really are legit downloads, maybe we should make getting those older versions more difficult and try to direct folks to the current version.
Also, it might be good to start a new download table for 2006 with just the current versions on the wiki page so you don't have to wade through so much old data to see what's happening.
Thanks for doing this.
Pieter
On 1/10/06, Mike Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After a number of people have given me a "hmm, now those numbers just
seem *wrong*" comment on the Chandler 0.6 download figures (see
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Projects/
QuantitativeCommunityInvolvementMetrics#Downloads ) I finally got a
chance to take a look at the script and have found the bug.
Basically windows downloads were being under-counted - I've correct the
bug and have re-run last week's numbers.
I'll be tweaking the script to try and re-run the previous weeks values
for 0.6
---
Bear
Build and Release Engineer
Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osafoundation.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://code-bear.com
PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111 D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
