Sheila Mooney wrote: > Heikki, is this meant to be only calendar related workflows or all the > performance goals for 0.7?
As I mentioned in the first message on Tuesday, we will be creating new tests as well. So no, it is not the complete list of performance goals. My purpose was to finalize the numbers for the existing tests, but I see my wording was a little misleading. > A major tenet for 0.7 is now around the table and task management and we > haven't really discussed what (if any) new use cases we should be > handling. Should we be trying to optimize for more than 3000 items? We > had talked about that back in the fall when we put together the 1.0 > stickie plan. Also, I know we aren't intending on having a "usable" > dashboard for 0.7 but it might be worthwhile to at least start tracking > some table related use cases such as searching and sorting. Good, this is the kind of feedback I was hoping for. And since we haven't discussed that much at all, I'm calling off the Monday deadline. I would prefer to keep the existing 3000 events tests we have because they give us historical data on how we are doing, and create new tests for other cases. However, there is a thing about too many tests as well (takes too long to run the suite) so we need to strike a balance. -- Heikki Toivonen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
