Switching to something like ElementTree now would allow us to build the packages and also to incorporate Eggs more fully into the Chandler domain IMO

Your right that later, once other python wrapped libs are egg-ified, we can bring them as needed in a much saner and cleaner manner.


On Jan 27, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Ted Leung wrote:

My only gripe w/ elementtree is the limited XPath support. But if libxml2 eventually turns into an egg, then I don't really care.

On Jan 27, 2006, at 10:49 AM, Grant Baillie wrote:

On Jan 27, 2006, at 10:16, Mike Taylor wrote:

Having libxml2 available during the build process is not a problem IMO

It's looking like zanshin and Sharing.py are the "culprits" :)

It would be a pleasure (and less than a day's work) to move zanshin onto ElementTree. That would obliviate some benighted hackery that was required to work around deficiencies in libxml2.

--Grant

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

----
Ted Leung                 Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
PGP Fingerprint: 1003 7870 251F FA71 A59A  CEE3 BEBA 2B87 F5FC 4B42


_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev


---
Bear

Build and Release Engineer
Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osafoundation.org

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://code-bear.com

PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111  D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29


Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to