And, of course, the system details: gcc 4.1-20051029 FreeBSD 5.4
512MB RAM, 3.2 GHz processor On 31/01/06, tsuraan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like one of the indices (the first one opened, actually) is > missing its segments file. Why this causes the abort several indices > later is a bit of a mystery, but I can at least work around this. > > A bug posted to the gcj bug tracker in 2000 indicated that sometimes > null exceptions weren't being propogated correctly and were just > causing aborts, but I assume this is fixed by now. Maybe the PyLucene > wrappers could have a catch-all for null pointer exceptions though, so > that aborts are prevented? I don't know how ugly that would get, but > aborts aren't good either. _______________________________________________ pylucene-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
