Heikki Toivonen wrote: > Aparna Kadakia wrote: >> Do we need to adopt anything special for the checkpoint builds? >> Currently we use the date and the rev number for >> e,g Chandler_osx_Checkpoint_20060221_r9578.app > > Hmm, good point, didn't think about those. > > bear thinks we wouldn't need anything for the checkpoints, they would be > indistinguishable from continuous builds with the exception that there > would perhaps be a "tag" in svn for them. > > I think it would add value if we could identify a checkpoint in the > version number as well. So far I just haven't been able to figure out how.
pje comes to the rescue again ;) 0.7alpha1.dev-r1111 would be a continous build (or something someone built themselves from a certain revision). 0.7alpha1.dev-r1111-checkpoint would still be the same revision, but would clearly indicate that this is the special checkpoint build. The Python egg tools say that 0.7alpha1.dev-r1111 < 0.7alpha1.dev-r1111-checkpoint which is also ok. -- Heikki Toivonen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
