Sorry to be thick but the semantic difference between "tags" and
"branches" is really lost on me, especially using SVN since there's no
real differences between the 2...
So, why can't we have:
chandler/
branches/
0.6/
release-0.6/
IOW, what do we gain by adding one extra bifurcation in the tree?
I infer from the threads that "tags" are "non modifiable" but is that
something actively enforced or just a convention we decided to adopt?
Cheers,
- Philippe
Mike Taylor wrote:
On Feb 22, 2006, at 5:18 PM, Heikki Toivonen wrote:
Mike Taylor wrote:
What I see that needs to change to support Heikki's proposal is that I
would create the 0.6 branch/tag in the tags directory:
chandler/
tags/
0.6/
Yeah, this is my preference. Alternatively
chandler/
tags/
release-0.6/
to make it really clear.
This would also bring Chandler in line with Cosmo and Scooby - so for
me this gets a +1
---
Bear
Build and Release Engineer
Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osafoundation.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://code-bear.com
PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111 D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
