On 3/6/06, Morgen Sagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think Chandler should assume that there will be a port 80
> ('http') server along with the port 443 ('https') server, and that
> they both refer to the same Cosmo instance. I'm not sure how
> Chandler could know this in a general way, without having site-
> specific logic (in other words, "if host == 'cosmo-demo' then port
> 443 is equivalent to 80") inside Chandler. It's perhaps unusual that
> cosmo-demo is set up this way, and I wouldn't count on it. I would
> be interested to hear what other people think.
i agree. might be useful to have a section on the cosmo-demo welcome
page about client compatibility, or at least links to the (yet to be
written) cosmo client config docs.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
