On 3/6/06, Lisa Dusseault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The xCalendar proposal is currently not going anywhere, and no other > vendors have proposed to support it. They ask, rightly, "why > bother". xCalendar isn't in itself any more extensible than iCalendar. > > Got any answers that might inspire people to adopt xCalendar? (My > answers are a little weak and involve XMPP and Atom, not pure CalDAV)
no, but it saves us from having to define our own xml dialect to describe calendar objects, and the existing xsl stylesheets will save us the effort of writing code to convert chandler event resources into icalendar ones. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
