Phillip J. Eby wrote:
It's certainly *possible*, if perhaps not advisable for user-level control on a per-item basis. We would have to have additional fields to *store* that choice, for each field that allows a choice, on every single item.

However, it's definitely possible for individual kinds to do this programmatically on a per-item basis (e.g. by detecting whether a message is outbound or inbound), which is probably more useful in the short term and doesn't impose any additional storage overhead.

I also think that what Mimi is talking about is more of a user-level (i.e. view-level) issue than a model-level issue. Perhaps the view could annotate the model to indicate which attributes it cares about?

In fact, I kind of wonder if this whole concept of who/about/etc is really a view-level annotation on specific kinds.

(I'm not wed to this idea, but I thought I'd throw it out there)

Alec

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to