Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
Ted has a list of stamping related bugs currently scheduled for
0.7alpha3:
https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2507 (unstamping
problems)
https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3735 (stamping
event as task resets alarm to none)
https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2117 (third party
parcels can foul up stamping)
Given that we are expecting to use stamping in 0.7alpha2, I'm
suggesting that we go ahead and work on stamping now, possibly
prioritizing some of the other domain model work later.
Bryan Stearns wrote:
Katie,
I'm not sure what you're asking, but:
I'm asking you if you need the labeling work done in 0.7alpha2. If we
can put this off until 0.7alpha3, it gives us more flexibility with
the schedule. Just trying to make dependencies clear.
Aha - I hadn't intended to do labeling work in alpha2 (I'm focusing on
general bugs and the event-notification stuff).
- I think the "consensus" plan (on Philippe's notes from the meeting
where I aired my stamping concerns,
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Projects/InviteEngineering) is
implementable: sending an event notification (an event+email item)
again to new people by resetting all the email attributes is
certainly doable.
Agreed that this is doable. I also want to make sure that Ted has time
on his schedule if there is any supporting domain model work that
needs to be done.
- However, I don't see how we get from there to something that
maintains the state of previous communications around an event; I
don't understand how versioning will work, when it's supposed to be
done, or how it will appear in the UI.
Yup, I understand that you are concerned about this and want to tackle
it. The next step is to talk about this at the design session tomorrow.
- I'm not sure what the "stamping bugs" are - after I saw the mention
in the phasing proposal, I asked Sheila about them and she didn't
know what specific bugs they were either.
Thanks (and thank you Ted, too!) for the list of bugs - I was concerned
that there were bugs that weren't in Bugzilla related to stamping, so
I'm relieved they're there.
In addition to the stamping bugs listed above, we've been tossing
around the idea of implementing stamping as annotations. This has
implications for both the sharing format and for the "dump and reload"
(née schema evolution) implementation.
As I understand annotations, they'll help with one stamping problem
(attribute-name collision), but not with the other issues I was
concerned about (relating to communication around events over time). I'm
looking forward to tomorrow's discussion.
...Bryan
I'm proposing that we take on the stamping related work now, and
looking to push some other work out to make room.
Cheers,
Katie
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
