On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 3:28 PM dave2wave (via GitHub) <g...@apache.org> wrote:
> > dave2wave commented on issue #38: > URL: https://github.com/apache/otava/issues/38#issuecomment-2733227901 > > I don't think that's true. If you wish clarification then please ask > legal-disc...@apache.org It's not obvious wich email and who you are repllying to, but I'm going to assume it's me. Yeah so before asking for the formal opinion, I would first go and review for example code snippets, t o determine what we actually have and wether they even reasonably could be the kind of file/snippet that this discussion is meaningful. And now that I looked around, I don't see that we even have such code examples. The examples/ directory actually contain config files, one for each different data backend. I presume it is well established that a short config file isn't a creative work, since each option is constrained by a limited set of allowed options that a user can even choose, and then that set is further constrained by constraints of reality. So this is something we could indeed ask legal-discuss, if there isn't consensus that the otava.yaml files could be without a license header. I should also say this isn't high priority for me, merely wanted to complete a discussion that branched off Sean's PR. henrik
