I agree with all 3 statements here :) So, the short-term plan sounds like:
1. Port Joe's branch to uv.
2. Copy-paste currently used signal-processing code to Otava.
3. Finish the upgrade OR find the next issue.

Best,
Alex



On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 2:46 PM Henrik Ingo <hen...@nyrkio.com> wrote:

> I thought about the signal processing code today and have an opinion:
>  - Thiscode really belongs in the same repo, so we should just go ahead and
> add it. I wouldn't even call it vendoring, I expect the division to
> disappear soon after we bring the two halves together.
>  - Regarding which version to work with, we should in any case just start
> with the version we consume now (1.5.somethiing?).
>  - If we then want to upgrade to the newest version we would do it as a
> stream of separate commits and so that you can follow the changes both to
> Otava code and e-divisive code in the same commit.
>
> When you break it down this way, it turns out we can go ahead and do 1 and
> 2 , and 3 we can discuss with MongoDB perf team when they have time.
>
> henrik
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 8:19 PM Alexander Sorokoumov <
> aleksandr.sorokou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I agree that updating the Python version is the most pressing sweeping
> > issue that also blocks adoption and the biggest challenge there is
> deciding
> > what to do with signal processing code. I propose to vendor the necessary
> > code from 1.3.5 to a module within Otava today (naturally, with giving
> > credit and referring to the original source code) and discuss
> collaboration
> > modes async when MongoDB folks respond on the other thread.
> >
> > Best,
> > Alex
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 5:25 AM Henrik Ingo <hen...@nyrkio.com> wrote:
> >
> > > By the way, now that uv is merged, is there also a plan to jump forward
> > on
> > > python versions?
> > >
> > > More generally what I'm really asking is, do we still have many
> > "sweeping"
> > > changes left. Changes that we may want to get out of the way before
> > opening
> > > up to general hacking on new features and such?
> > >
> > > I guess deciding on the location of the e-divisive / signal processing
> > code
> > > is somewhat sweeping, even if not as much in your face as chaning the
> > > project name or build tool.
> > >
> > > henrik
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 1:02 PM Henrik Ingo <hen...@nyrkio.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > First ever public discussion about a technical change in Otava! Feels
> > > > right.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 6:04 AM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> As a mentor I want to give a meta +1 that you had this discussion on
> > the
> > > >> dev list.
> > > >>
> > > >> > On Aug 4, 2025, at 4:18 AM, Lari Hotari <lhot...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > +1 for using uv.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > -Lari
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 at 01:28, Alexander Sorokoumov
> > > >> > <aleksandr.sorokou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Hey everyone,
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> This change is significant, so I wanted to open a discussion
> about
> > it
> > > >> first.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> The main motivation for this change has been that the current
> > Poetry
> > > >> >> version does not support later Python versions and newer Poetry
> > > >> versions do
> > > >> >> not support our current project config format. Since the build
> > system
> > > >> >> upgrade requires additional effort, I was wondering if it is time
> > to
> > > >> shop
> > > >> >> for an alternative and did find uv.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> In my opinion, uv is a more promising alternative for 2 reasons:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> 1. It follows an approach similar to build tools one can find in
> > > other
> > > >> >> ecosystems (looking at Maven/Bazel/Gradle). It is a single
> > > entry-point
> > > >> to
> > > >> >> manage dependencies, python versions, build and upload artifacts,
> > > etc.
> > > >> I
> > > >> >> did not find a way to also run tests and benchmarks without
> > > >> tox/pytest, but
> > > >> >> it is definitely a step in the right direction IMO.
> > > >> >> 2. It is fast. I encourage reviewers to compare how long it takes
> > to
> > > >> sync
> > > >> >> dependencies or re-build a lock file with uv vs Poetry.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> I have opened a PR to showcase what the project will look like
> > after
> > > >> this
> > > >> >> change https://github.com/apache/otava/pull/80.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Please let me know what you think.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Best,
> > > >> >> Alex
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *nyrkio.com <http://nyrkio.com/>* ~ *git blame for performance*
> > > >
> > > > Henrik Ingo, CEO
> > > > hen...@nyrkio.com                               LinkedIn:
> > > > www.linkedin.com/in/heingo
> > > > +358 40 569 7354                                 Twitter:
> > > > twitter.com/h_ingo
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *nyrkio.com <http://nyrkio.com/>* ~ *git blame for performance*
> > >
> > > Henrik Ingo, CEO
> > > hen...@nyrkio.com                               LinkedIn:
> > > www.linkedin.com/in/heingo
> > > +358 40 569 7354                                 Twitter:
> > > twitter.com/h_ingo
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> *nyrkio.com <http://nyrkio.com/>* ~ *git blame for performance*
>
> Henrik Ingo, CEO
> hen...@nyrkio.com                               LinkedIn:
> www.linkedin.com/in/heingo
> +358 40 569 7354                                 Twitter:
> twitter.com/h_ingo
>

Reply via email to