That name is good. Setup the repo and I will move the code over.

Joe Drumgoole

+087 2995547
https://bsky.app/profile/joedrumgoole.com



On Tue 17 Mar 2026, 20:02 Alexander Sorokoumov, <
[email protected]> wrote:

> After thinking about it for a bit, I do believe that a separate repo is the
> best way forward.
>
> A considered alternative was to go full monorepo, where both the
> demonstrator and the website are pulled into the main repo. This option may
> become interesting after version 1.0.0, but would be IMO premature at the
> moment. I'd rather invest our limited resources into other initiatives
> (architecture discussion, documentation, releases, etc).
>
> As a bike-shading suggestion, wdyt about otava-playground as a name?
>
> Best,
> Alex
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 10:18 AM Henrik Ingo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 8:13 PM Alexander Sorokoumov <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > One thing to consider is do we ever want to release/publish
> > otava-test-data
> > > to PyPi? If the answer is yes, then a separate repo is the best choice
> > IMO.
> > > If the answer is no (e.g., we don't release the website), then the
> > location
> > > matters less as per Dave's comment.
> > >
> > > My proposal is not to release it. Not that it couldn't be released, but
> > at
> > least for the foreseeable future, it's not worth the overhead involved.
> So
> > yes, this is why it aligns with otava-website repo and not otava.
> >
> > > If in the same repo, would they then be subject to consideration and
> > voting
> > > for release?  And, how would that work, wrt release artifacts?
> > >
> > > Highlighting a potential painpoint.  Doesn't matter much to me.
> > >
> >
> > Exactly. We would have to make sure the demonstrator doesn't get into the
> > release tarball, or if we do include it, we actually have to test it each
> > time.
> >
> > henrik
> >
> > --
> > *nyrkio.com <http://nyrkio.com/>* ~ *Continuous Benchmarking as a
> Service*
> >
> > Henrik Ingo, CEO
> > [email protected]                               LinkedIn:
> > www.linkedin.com/in/heingo
> > +358 40 569 7354                                 Twitter:
> > twitter.com/h_ingo
> >
>

Reply via email to