Hi Wiktor, I would vote for a configurable format. As far as I know OTRS is used in a lot of different countries using their own date format so it is kind of strange to enforce one format upon all users.
Kind regards, Tom Hesp -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wiktor Wodecki Sent: dinsdag 30 december 2003 11:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [dev] Time Layout Question Hello, I noted that time is represented in very different formats across the OTRS. Once we have YYYY/MM/DD, the other time YYYY/DD/MM and then we have classical DD.MM.YYYY and so on. I think this needs some harmonization. What do we vote for? Configurable or not? My favourite (I'm not an american, so...) is DD.MM.YYYY -- Regards, Wiktor Wodecki net mobile AG - 40470 Duesseldorf - Germany 923B DCF8 070C 9FDD 5E05 9AE3 E923 5A35 182C 9783 _______________________________________________ OTRS mailing list: dev - Webpage: http://otrs.org/ Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/dev To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ OTRS mailing list: dev - Webpage: http://otrs.org/ Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/dev To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dev
