Today's developer telco has spawned a discussion about how more translations
should be added to the existing translations hash (code for this is contained
in each Language-module).
Two solutions have been discussed:
1.
sub Data {
my $Self = shift;
$Self->{Translation} = { %{$Self->{Translation}},
'green' => 'grün',
'yellow' => 'gelb',
'Being blue is not a lot of fun'
=> 'Blau sein macht im Deutschen schon mehr Spaß',
};
return 1;
}
2.
sub Data {
my $Self = shift;
$Self->{Translation}->{green} = 'grün';
$Self->{Translation}->{yellow} = 'gelb';
$Self->{Translation}->{Being blue is not a lot of fun}
= 'Blau sein macht im Deutschen schon mehr Spaß';
return 1;
}
Solution 1 is (slightly) easier to read, but it is slower and requires more
memory, since it copies the hash with the existing translations into a new
hash. This copying does not scale well if there are a lot of translation
modules being loaded (each one copies the hash, which is getting bigger and
bigger).
In the telco, I had suggested a third way that is as easy to read and (as I
thought at the time ;-) does not suffer from bad performance:
3.
sub Data {
my $Self = shift;
$Self->AddTranslations( {
'green' => 'grün',
'yellow' => 'gelb',
'Being blue is not a lot of fun'
=> 'Blau sein macht im Deutschen schon mehr Spaß',
} );
return 1;
}
Where AddTranslations would be implemented in Kernel::Language.pm:
sub AddTranslations {
my ( $Self, $Translations ) = @_;
return if ref $Translations ne 'HASH';
for my $TrKey (keys %$Translations) {
$Self->{Translations}->{$TrKey} = $Translations->{$TrKey};
}
return;
}
Benchmarking has shown that solution 2 is in fact unusable for many modules,
as the copying of the hash becomes very slow. Solutions 1 and 3 scale ok (i.e.
O(n)) but solution 1 is still twice as fast as solution 3 (as the creation of
the temporary hash that is being passed into the method costs time).
Please have a look at the three solutions and tell me what you think. I
personally would favour solution 1, as it is the fastest and IMHO only a tiny
bit harder to read than the other two.
Now that I have looked at the code in Kernel::Language, I wonder if we should
not try to find a way to limit the loading of Language modules to the ones
which are actually being used by the current HTTP-request.
Please correct me if I'm wrong (and I hope I am), but as far as I can see, we
currently load *all* available Language modules in the constructor of
Kernel::Language.
In an OTRS setup that has many modules installed, this would cause quite a
performance hit, wouldn't it?
cheers,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
OTRS mailing list: dev - Webpage: http://otrs.org/
Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/dev
To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dev
