+1 for merge, it will be good to have people use it.

Cheers,
Dinesh

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022, 10:51 AM Mukul Kumar Singh <mksingh.apa...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
> Thanks for all the work on this feature.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mukul
>
> On 13/04/22 9:01 am, Sammi Chen wrote:
> > +1 for the merge.
> >
> > Thanks a lot to Uma and all contributors working on EC.  Great work!
> >
> > It's so great that we have EC in Ozone now.
> >
> > Bests,
> > Sammi
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 at 13:59, Uma gangumalla <umamah...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Ozone Devs,
> >>
> >> As you may know, we have been actively developing Ozone Erasure Coding
> >> support in a separate branch HDDS-3816-ec.
> >>
> >> We have finished the development of EC key write and read functionality.
> >> The support of offline recovery( Recovering replica from node loss)
> will be
> >> part of second phase work.
> >>
> >> Since the code has already grown and increasingly started seeing merge
> >> complications, we would like to propose to merge the current EC branch
> into
> >> master.
> >>
> >> We filed the new JIRA(HDDS-6462) for the second phase of work and
> continued
> >> the offline recovery work there.
> >>
> >> Details on Changes:
> >>
> >>     -
> >>
> >>     Most of the EC core logic went to newly extended classes. Key
> changes
> >>     went into EC*OutputStream and EC*InputStream classes for write and
> read
> >>     respectively. Based on replication type, ECPipelineProvider will be
> >> chosen
> >>     for creating EC pipelines.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     -
> >>
> >>     Since we cannot represent the EC replication in the existing
> replication
> >>     factor, we have introduced ECReplicationConfig. The
> ReplicationConfig
> >>     interface is already pushed to master, so it’s not a new idea coming
> >>     through this branch merge now. What is newly coming here is the
> >>     ECReplicationConfig class which can be used to express EC
> replication
> >>     configuration.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     -
> >>
> >>     We wanted to provide the support to enable EC at bucket level. To
> >>     simplify some complications, we have moved the default replication
> >>     configurations from client to server.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     -
> >>
> >>     Client side replication type and replication factor removed from the
> >>     configuration files and introduced the
> ozone.server.default.replication
> >>     and ozone.server.default.replication.type.We would continue to
> respect
> >> if
> >>     one configures at client side explicitly or passed through APIs,
> >> otherwise
> >>     server side bucket level properties or server side default
> configuration
> >>     would take effect.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     -
> >>
> >>     Other than this change, the rest of EC side code should not impact
> any
> >>     of the existing code flows.
> >>
> >>
> >> We have finished documentation JIRA(HDDS-6172) for covering this feature
> >> and we will continue to improve further in master.
> >>
> >> Git Branch Name : HDDS-3816-ec
> >>
> >> JIRAs: HDDS-3816 and HDDS-5351
> >>
> >> Completed tasks: ~ 142
> >>
> >> + We are covering the following two mandatory JIRAs:
> >>
> >> 1. HDDS-6209: EC: [Forward compatibility issue] New client to older
> server
> >> could fail due to the unavailability for client default replication
> config
> >>
> >> 2. HDDS-5909: EC: Onboard EC into upgrade framework.
> >>
> >> PRs reviews in-progress and expected to close in a day or two.
> >>
> >> Few other JIRAs in HDDS-3816 are still open but I believe they're not
> >> blockers for merge.
> >>
> >> In short what you can do now with this feature:
> >>
> >>     -
> >>
> >>     You can enable EC at bucket level and cluster level.
> >>
> >> How to enable it at bucket level? Just create the bucket by passing the
> ec
> >> replication options.
> >>
> >>     -
> >>
> >>     You can create EC keys and read the same back.
> >>     -
> >>
> >>     You should be able to continue writing even when chosen nodes are
> >>     failing. (Of Course minimum of Data+Parity live nodes should be
> >> available
> >>     in cluster for complete the write)
> >>     -
> >>
> >>     You should be able to read the file back even if a few nodes failed
> in
> >>     the same ec block group(Failures should not be more than parity
> number
> >> of
> >>     nodes.).
> >>
> >> What is pending? Offline recovery of lost/missing EC containers. As
> >> mentioned above, post merge of this branch, I will create a separate
> JIRA
> >> for starting the work for OfflineRecovery.
> >>
> >>
> >> There are automated acceptance test cases already added. HDDS-6231
> >>
> >> In addition to that, we have also performed basic Acceptance Testing in
> >> physical cluster:
> >>
> >>     1.
> >>
> >>     Installed 10 nodes cluster and created EC bucket (3:2).
> >>
> >> Uploaded 10GB key.
> >>
> >> Downloaded the same key and checked the md5sum.
> >>
> >>     1.
> >>
> >>     Uploaded 8GB key.
> >>
> >> Downloaded the same key and checked the md5sum.
> >>
> >>     1.
> >>
> >>     Uploaded 3MB key
> >>
> >> Downloaded the same and verified md5sum.
> >>
> >>     1.
> >>
> >>     Changed bucket to (6:3)
> >>
> >> Uploaded 8GB key
> >>
> >> Download the same.
> >>
> >> Also verified the new key should be in 6:3 policy and old keys must be
> >> 3:2.Verified
> >> with several different size key writes and reads.
> >>
> >> Merge checklist items assessment is here:
> >>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OZONE/Ozone+EC+Branch%28HDDS-3816-ec%29+Phase-1+%3A+Merge+Checklist
> >>
> >> Big shoutout to Stephen O'Donnell <sodonn...@cloudera.com>, Istvan
> Fajth
> >> <pi...@cloudera.com> for great efforts in core development and also
> thanks
> >> a lot  to Sammi, Mingchao Zhao, Mark Gui, Kaijie for collaborating on
> some
> >> of the EC tasks.
> >>
> >> Thanks to Marton for design discussion and on some dev tasks as well.
> >>
> >> Thanks to many others who were involved in design discussions, Arpit,
> Sidd,
> >> Jitendra, Mukul, Sanjay, Karthik, Bharat, Nanda, Shashi, Prashanth,
> Rakesh,
> >> Yiqun Lin.
> >> Sorry if I miss anyone here, but your efforts are much appreciated.
> Without
> >> your tremendous help, we would have not reached this position yet.
> >>
> >> If there are no objections for the merge, I will start the official vote
> >> later.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> EC Branch Devs
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ozone.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to