+1 Regards Lokesh
> On 26-May-2022, at 6:39 AM, Bharat Viswanadham <bha...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 for merge. > > Thanks, > Bharat > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 1:41 PM Uma Maheswara Rao Gangumalla < > umaganguma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Regards, >> Uma >> >> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 2:15 AM Sammi Chen <sammic...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Dear Ozone Devs, >>> >>> I 'm starting this thread to vote for the merge of Ozone Datanode RocksDB >>> merge feature branch (HDDS-3630 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3630) into the master branch. >>> >>> Currently there will be one RocksDB for each Container on datanode, which >>> leads to hundreds of thousands of RocksDB instances on one datanode. It's >>> very challenging to manage this amount of RocksDB instances in one JVM. >>> Please refer to the "problem statement" section of the design document[1] >>> for challenge details. Unlike the current approach, Datanode RocksDB >> merge >>> feature will use only one RocksDB for each data volume. With far fewer >>> RocksDB instances to manage, the write path performance and DN stability >>> are improved, Refer to the Micro Benchmark Data section of the design >>> document[1]. >>> >>> The feature has been developed in the last 8 months. And it has also been >>> deployed in Tencent production for 5 months. Now we have reviewed all >> core >>> patches, and merged them into the feature branch, including new disk >>> layout, new container schema, container replication, container deletion, >>> block deletion, container scanner, non-rolling upgrade. There are no >>> blocking JIRAs left. Document and the acceptance test are added too. >>> >>> For the sake of master branch feature stability, we provide a >> configuration >>> to enable/disable this feature. Currently by default, this feature is >>> disabled. We can turn it on later once we believe it is stable enough. >>> >>> For more information, please check out the Merge RocksDB in datanode >>> feature wiki page here: >>> >>> >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OZONE/Merge+Rocksdb+in+Datanode+%28HDDS-3630%29+Merge+Checklist >>> >>> Great thanks to Mark Gui<guim...@126.com>, majority feature >> investigation, >>> design and core development is contributed by him. Thanks a lot to Runzhi >>> Wang, for first finding current schema V2 layout challenges and >> initiating >>> the proposal of merge RocksDB, to Nanda, Mukul, Wei-Chiu, Jackson and >>> Stephen O’Donnell for the help in design review, design discussion and >> code >>> review. If I miss anyone here, sorry for that, but your efforts are >> well >>> appreciated. >>> >>> >>> [1] Merge RocksDB in Datanode Design Doc >>> < >>> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oPCRUVqTJDbYITbwvoVCOZ2-k108FwOXVhq9ukDKHbQ/edit#heading=h.w06vnlv65sb6 >>>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sammi >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ozone.apache.org