Thanks for working on the release Yiyang. The container scanner and volume
scanner improvements I have been working on are ready for release.

Ethan

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 12:35 AM Janus Chow <yiyang0...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello, Dev,
>
>     For the above mentioned topics, can I ask if they are ready for the new
> release?
>
>     Hope to hear from the PICs so that we can move forward with the
> release.
>
>
> Warm Regards.
>
> --
> Yiyang Zhou
>
>
> Janus Chow <yiyang0...@gmail.com> 于2023年7月26日周三 15:10写道:
>
> > Hello, Dev,
> >
> >     This is a addendum for last topic summary.
> >
> > Tag Count URL
> > Snapshot 127 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6517
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7984
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6517>
> > RM 74 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7759
> > EC 65 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6462
> > Recon 39
> > Certificate 27 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7391
> > Direct copy 25 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-2274
> > Hsync 23 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7593
> >
> >
> > Warm Regards.
> >
> > --
> > Yiyang Zhou
> >
> >
> > Janus Chow <yiyang0...@gmail.com> 于2023年7月26日周三 15:00写道:
> >
> >> Hello, Dev,
> >>
> >>     I have made a rough summary on the PRs since 1.3.0, there are over
> >> 900+ PRs since Jan 2023. Thank you all for the great contribution.
> >>
> >>     Among the PRs, I have picked out some main topics as follows:
> >>
> >> Tag Count URL
> >> Snapshot 127 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6517
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7984
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6517>
> >> RM 74 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7759
> >> EC 65 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6462
> >> Recon 39
> >> Certificate 27 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7391
> >> Direct copy 25 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-2274
> >>     I will try to check with the PICs of these topics to see if these
> >> projects are about to be suitable for a release cut.
> >>
> >>     Welcome to add or supplement any missing information.
> >>
> >>     Thank you again for the great work.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Ref:
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16ZiB5Aeg_bWCDuPJ1ie5BzZg2ih3dYUBObg94JOV2EM/edit?usp=sharing
> >>
> >> Warm Regards.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Yiyang Zhou
> >>
> >>
> >> Janus Chow <yiyang0...@gmail.com> 于2023年6月28日周三 10:58写道:
> >>
> >>> Thanks, Sammi, Siyao.
> >>>
> >>> I have created the ticket for the release:
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8944
> >>>
> >>> Feel free to add comments about the features or patches that need to be
> >>> added to Ozone 1.4.0. I will wait until all comments are resolved, and
> then
> >>> create the release branch.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you all.
> >>>
> >>> Warm Regards.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Yiyang Zhou
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Siyao Meng <si...@apache.org> 于2023年6月28日周三 05:18写道:
> >>>
> >>>>  +1 for kicking off the 1.4.0 release process.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks Yiyang for volunteering to be the RM.
> >>>>
> >>>> On the snapshot feature (HDDS-6517
> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6517>) front, public APIs
> >>>> and
> >>>> proto messages should now be stable. So it wouldn't block a release
> >>>> with it
> >>>> atm.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -Siyao
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jun 26, 2023 at 9:59:15 PM, Sammi Chen <sammic...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > Thank you,  Yiyang,  for volunteering the 1.4.0 RM !
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Bests,
> >>>> > Sammi
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 14:50, Janus Chow <yiyang0...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Hello, Everyone.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >     I'm quite interested in this release work, if the RM is still
> >>>> >
> >>>> > available, I would like to be the RM of Ozone 1.4.0.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Warm Regards.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Yiyang Zhou
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > István Fajth <fapi...@gmail.com> 于2023年6月8日周四 16:08写道:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > On the certificate rotation front, we are approaching a major
> >>>> milestone,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > with
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > all services becoming capable of rotating their certificates
> without
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > service disruption including the rootCA certificate as well.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > We also have resolved a few things around the need for the
> >>>> primordial
> >>>> >
> >>>> > node,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > we can not get rid of the need of a special node during the first
> >>>> >
> >>>> > bootstrap
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > of
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > the PKI system, but after that the special node is not needed
> >>>> anymore,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > and
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > the
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > leader SCM will be able to initiate the rotation of CA
> certificates
> >>>> we
> >>>> >
> >>>> > have
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > in
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > the system.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > For us the next big thing is handling the certificate revocation,
> >>>> also to
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > do
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > some further code cleanup and simplification, it would be nice to
> >>>> have it
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > released soon after it is ready, but as we do not have it right
> now
> >>>> >
> >>>> > either
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > we can live through another release without it. It is a bit
> >>>> unrealistic
> >>>> >
> >>>> > to
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > have it included in a 1.5.0 release if it comes out within the
> next
> >>>> 1-2
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > month.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > But the finished certificate rotation feature is somewhat
> >>>> mandatory, as
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > there
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > are changes in how we store certificates, and even though the
> >>>> startup
> >>>> >
> >>>> > needs
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > to
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > and will handle the old format, we would like to introduce a
> change
> >>>> and
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > transform the metadata directory structure during an upgrade
> >>>> >
> >>>> > finalization.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > Pifta
> >>>> >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > Ritesh Shukla <rit...@cloudera.com.invalid> ezt írta (időpont:
> >>>> 2023.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > jún.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > 7., Sze, 18:53):
> >>>> >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > We can include the block token work that is in the process of
> >>>> being
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > merged.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > That work considerably impacts performance, and delaying it to
> >>>> 1.5.0
> >>>> >
> >>>> > will
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > lead to a negative experience with a secure Ozone cluster for
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > folks adopting Ozone in 1.4.0
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > Regards,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > Ritesh
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:49 AM Ethan Rose
> >>>> <er...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > +1 for a 1.4.0 release. We had hoped for a 1.3.1 release but
> it
> >>>> looks
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > like
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > that never gained the momentum it needed. It would be good to
> >>>> hear
> >>>> >
> >>>> > from
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > devs working on larger features whether or not they would like
> >>>> to
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > target
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > this release. Things like snapshots, cert rotation, hsync,
> recon
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > improvements etc. From my end I'm planning to have v1of the
> >>>> container
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > scanner done by the end of this month. It would be nice to
> have
> >>>> in
> >>>> >
> >>>> > the
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > next
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > release but not essential.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > Also worth noting that doing a major release will lock in
> >>>> protos and
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > disk
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > structures as they are on master for compatibility reasons. We
> >>>> have
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > tried
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > to keep the master branch always releasable, but just an FYI
> to
> >>>> devs
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > working on larger tasks on master right now.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > Ethan
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 1:44 AM Sammi Chen <
> sammic...@apache.org
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > Dear Ozone Devs,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > It's been almost 5 month since the last major 1.3.0 release
> >>>> in Dec
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > 2022.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > In the past 5 month, there have been a lot of issues fixed
> and
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > improvements
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > made, together with new features, like httpFs, scm
> >>>> decommission,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > Recon
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > new
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > functions, snapshot, EC balancer support, the the coming
> >>>> symmetric
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > block
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > token and certificate rotation, etc.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > So far, there are already 733 JIRAs resolved on 1.4.0.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+HDDS+and+fixVersion+%3D+1.4.0
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > Usually it will take months to do a major release. So I
> >>>> propose to
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > start
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > the discussion of 1.4.0 now, things like which features
> >>>> should be
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > involved
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > in this release.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > And this release doesn't have a Release Manager yet.
> Welcome
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > anyone(Comitters or PMCs, for it requires some privileges on
> >>>> Apache
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > facilities to do the release) to volunteer to be the RM of
> >>>> 1.4.0.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > Regards,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > Sammi
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > --
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > Pifta
> >>>> >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>
>

Reply via email to