+1 on the merge.

Disclaimer: I have contributed to branch HDDS-7593.

-Siyao

On Jul 30, 2024 at 3:39:25 PM, Ethan Rose <er...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks Wei-Chiu, I'm ok with handling these in follow up tasks. Please
> share the Jira links when you have them. This was my main concern, so the
> merge is +1 from me now.
>
> Ethan
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 5:34 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <weic...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> I had an offline discussion with Ethan regarding a couple of potential
>
> issues:
>
>
>    1.
>
>
>    *New Client with ozone.fs.hsync.enabled*: If a new client with
>
>    ozone.fs.hsync.enabled sends an hsync request to an old OM, the request
>
>    is sent as a KeyCommit request with additional fields for hsync. The old
>
>    OM, not recognizing these fields, would treat the request as a normal
>
>    KeyCommit (i.e., closing the key). The outcome of this is uncertain.
>
>    2.
>
>
>    *Downgrade Scenario*: If a cluster is upgraded from Ozone 1.4 to 1.5 and
>
>    the feature flag is enabled, Ozone would allow hsync operations before
>
> the
>
>    upgrade is finalized. This is problematic because version 1.4 does not
>
>    fully support this feature.
>
>
> Both issues can be addressed with new layout versions. I will open JIRA
>
> tickets to include these fixes in the next release, version 1.5.0.
>
>
> I hope this explanation makes sense.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 10:20 AM Ethan Rose <er...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> > Hi Wei-Chiu, I'm still unclear on the compatibility requirements of this
>
> > feature.
>
> >
>
> > Feature flags are not a substitute for layout versions. Layout versions
>
> are
>
> > monotonic: they make sure once something is enabled it cannot be disabled
>
> > via a downgrade (the downgraded cluster will fail to start). Feature
>
> flags
>
> > are not monotonic. If an old version defaults to false and a new version
>
> > defaults to true, the flag will get reverted on downgrade while data
>
> > written while it was true will still be present. Whether or not this
>
> causes
>
> > problems is dependent on the implementation of the feature.
>
> >
>
> > Can you clarify what disk and protocol changes are part of this feature
>
> on
>
> > OM and Datanodes? Then we can work out what is actually required for
>
> > compatibility.
>
> >
>
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 11:43 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <weic...@apache.org>
>
> > wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > hi Ethan,
>
> > >
>
> > > The OM layout version change was for rejecting hsync requests to OM
>
> until
>
> > > the upgrade completes.
>
> > > The "HSYC" layout version was shipped in Ozone 1.4.0.
>
> > > IIRC I did touch upon this in the release vote thread, that because
>
> > there's
>
> > > a feature flag ozone.fs.hsync.enabled which disables the feature
>
> > entirely,
>
> > > the HSYNC layout version is essentially a no-op. We enabled the feature
>
> > > flag in the feature branch. If this is a concern we can make it
>
> disabled
>
> > by
>
> > > default again.
>
> > >
>
> > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 1:05 AM Ashish kumar <ashis.kr.2...@gmail.com>
>
> > > wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > > > Thanks Ethan for looking into this.
>
> > > >
>
> > > > >>It looks like this line in the merge checklist was not updated.
>
> > > > Updated the checklist.
>
> > > >
>
> > > > >> Can you go
>
> > > > into more details about the OM compatibility for lease recovery or
>
> > other
>
> > > > operations?
>
> > > > Lease recovery is completely redesigned and so both client and server
>
> > > needs
>
> > > > to be upgraded to make it work correctly.
>
> > > > In the old design, lease recovery was dependent only on the client
>
> and
>
> > > OM,
>
> > > > but now it involves datanode as well.
>
> > > > Apart from this compatibility is related to "Incremental chunk list"
>
> > > which
>
> > > > is already taken care of.
>
> > > >
>
> > > > >> DataNode layout version "HBASE_SUPPORT"
>
> > > > Yes this is only related to incremental chunk list. We will update
>
> > with a
>
> > > > more meaningful name as HBASE_INCREMENTAL_CHUNK_SUPPORT.
>
> > > > Also will update the merge checklist in more detail about this.
>
> > > >
>
> > > > Thanks,
>
> > > > Ashish
>
> > > >
>
> > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 12:50 AM Ethan Rose <er...@apache.org>
>
> wrote:
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > Thanks for all the work on this. Looks good overall, just a few
>
> > > > > questions on compatibility:
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > It looks like this line in the merge checklist was not updated. Can
>
> > you
>
> > > > go
>
> > > > > into more details about the OM compatibility for lease recovery or
>
> > > other
>
> > > > > operations?
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > > A new OM version number was introduced to prevent new client
>
> > sending
>
> > > > > > atomic key overwrite request to old OM which does not support
>
> this
>
> > > > > feature.
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > Additionally, new DataNode layout version "HBASE_SUPPORT" was
>
> added.
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > Can you add some details about what changes on the disk layout
>
> after
>
> > > this
>
> > > > > feature is finalized? Is this related to the incremental chunk list
>
> > or
>
> > > > > something more? Perhaps a more descriptive layout feature name
>
> would
>
> > > help
>
> > > > > here as well.
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > Ethan
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 11:43 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
>
> weic...@apache.org
>
> > >
>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > > I am +1 (binding)
>
> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 4:05 AM Ashish kumar <
>
> > > ashis.kr.2...@gmail.com>
>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > Hi Ozone developers,
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > I would like to propose merging HDDS-7593 (HSync and lease
>
> > > recovery)
>
> > > > > > > feature branch into master.
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > This feature is to support HSync and lease recovery,
>
> > > > > > > which enables HBase to run on Ozone.
>
> > > > > > > More details about the feature are present in design documents
>
> > > > attached
>
> > > > > > > in the below mentioned Ozone confluence page link.
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > Checklist for feature branch merge:
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OZONE/Supporting+HSync+and+lease+recovery+-+HDDS-7593
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > Feature Jira Link:
>
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7593
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least a week.
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > Thanks,
>
> > > > > > > Ashish Kumar
>
> > > > > > >
>
> > > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to