Forget to mention that the suggestion isn't required to be included in this
1.4.1 do release.

On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 16:36, Sammi Chen <sammic...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks for the info, Nanda.
> I try to understand this.  So "white_check_mark" means we will have new
> dot releases once any CVE is found on this release version.
> Currently only the last minor release(1.x, 2.x) has this support.  We drop
> the support for all previous releases. Is this the rule we follow now?
> If this is the case, I would suggest that we add a clear statement about
> the rule in SECURITY.md or somewhere on Ozone website.
> Based on the above rule, dot releases, such as 1.4.x,  seem not be the
> target of the "white_check_mark" flag.
>
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 14:20, Nandakumar <na...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> >
>> > Does anyone know what this "white_check_mark" means?
>>
>> My understanding is that the "white_check_mark" denotes that the
>> particular
>> release is currently supported and the user can expect minor releases with
>> security fixes.
>> This means if there are any security issues identified in the supported
>> release we should fix and make a new security/minor release from that
>> branch.
>>
>> I'm ok with either having this in the SECURITY.md file or tracking this in
>> the Ozone website. (We can even do both)
>>
>> Old discussion on supported version:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/9zw8v6lv7ogk4rj4yqyt10g0gwtrf60v
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 11:00 AM Sammi Chen <sammic...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Does anyone know what this "white_check_mark" means?
>> > Do we really need this "Version, Supported" table in this SECURITY.md
>> file,
>> > can we remove it?
>> >
>> > On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 00:55, Ethan Rose <er...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Yes we should add a step in the guide to update the security file with
>> > the
>> > > current release when a new one goes out. Thanks Nanda for catching
>> this.
>> > I
>> > > had been tracking updates required to the guide as part of this
>> release
>> > > process locally but hadn't shared anything yet. I just filed
>> HDDS-11654
>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11654> so we can keep
>> track
>> > of
>> > > the updates we should make to the guide when the release goes out.
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 10:22 AM Xi Chen <che...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Nanda
>> > > > Thanks for your check and suggestions
>> > > >
>> > > > Q: The code name for the release is still set to "Hot Springs"
>> which is
>> > > of
>> > > > 1.4.0, should we use a new name for 1.4.1?
>> > > >
>> > > > A: Currently, Ozone only changes the national park tag when it
>> releases
>> > > > the master branch, The minor branch release maintains the national
>> park
>> > > tag
>> > > > unchanged. e.g. Both the national park tags for ozone-1.2 and
>> > ozone-1.2.1
>> > > > are “Glacier”.
>> > > > So ozone-1.4.1 should keep the national park tag unchanged ("Hot
>> > Springs"
>> > > > ).
>> > > >
>> > > > Q: 1.4.1 release information is missing in ·, The SECURITY.md file
>> > should
>> > > > be updated with 1.4.1 details.
>> > > >
>> > > > A: Currently we don't seem to be updating “SECURITY.md” as part of a
>> > new
>> > > > release, I can't find any steps for updating “SECURITY.md” in the
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://ozone-site-v2.staged.apache.org/docs/developer-guide/project/release-guide/
>> > > > Last updated SECURITY.md is
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-10214
>> > > > Do we need to update “SECURITY.md” every time we release a new
>> version?
>> > > if
>> > > > so we should add this step to the Apache Release Manager Guide
>> > > >
>> > > > Xi Chen
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On 2024/11/05 13:37:37 Nandakumar wrote:
>> > > > > Thanx Xi Chen for driving the release.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > - Verified checksums
>> > > > > - Verified signatures
>> > > > > - Built from source
>> > > > > - Checked docs are included in the release artifact
>> > > > > - Branch structure in GitHub looks good
>> > > > > - Checked 'ozone version' output
>> > > > >     * The code name for the release is still set to "Hot Springs"
>> > > > > which is of 1.4.0, should we use a new name for 1.4.1?
>> > > > > - 1.4.1 release information is missing in SECURITY.md
>> > > > >     * The SECURITY.md file should be updated with 1.4.1 details.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -Nanda
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 3:50 PM mrchenx <mrch...@126.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Dear Ozone Devs,    As discussed in the last email, I am calling
>> > for
>> > > a
>> > > > vote on Apache Ozone 1.4.1 RC2.
>> > > > > >     We have released 1.4.0 on Jan 19th. Now there are 223 new
>> > commits
>> > > > already landed on 1.4.1 branch, Includes Ratis upgrade (upgrade to
>> > Ratis
>> > > > 3.1.1), some bug fixes, as well as performance optimizations, and
>> some
>> > > > necessary dependencies.    I am calling for a vote on Apache Ozone
>> > 1.4.1
>> > > > RC2.   - The RC2 tag can be found on Github at:
>> > > > > >         -
>> > > https://github.com/apache/ozone/releases/tag/ozone-1.4.1-RC2
>> > > > > >    - 223 Jiras were cherry-pick for ozone-1.4.1
>> > > > > >         -
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HDDS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.4.1
>> > > > > >    - The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
>> > > > > >         -
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ozone/1.4.1-rc2/
>> > > > > >    - Maven artifacts are staged at:
>> > > > > >         -
>> > > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheozone-1025
>> > > > > >    - The public key used to sign the artifacts can be found at:
>> > > > > >         - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/ozone/KEYS
>> > > > > >    - The fingerprint of the key used to sign the artifacts is:
>> > > > > >         - 0D8C19F5514E2786007936F758C87003FF9A1A38
>> > > > > >    The vote will run for 7 days, ending on Nov 12th 2024.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Xi Chen
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org
>> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ozone.apache.org
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org
>> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ozone.apache.org
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to