Hi Ozone community, Thank you for the feedback.
Regarding the recent discussions on *HDDS-13978* and *HDDS-13844*, I have decided to include the following issues in this release: 1. HDDS-13844. Decouple DirectoryDeletingService delete batching from Ratis request size 2. HDDS-13004. Snapshot Cache lock on a specific snapshotId 3. HDDS-13978. OMLockDetails should not be used as the object returns a ThreadLocal Object 4. HDDS-13848. [STS] Artifacts for Ranger to authorize STS token Since the PR [1][2] is ready and merging it is straightforward, I will include these commits to ensure stability. However, to avoid incrementing the RC count further, I will *refresh (re-roll) the RC2 artifacts and git tag* instead of creating RC3. *Please Note:* I will update the mailing list once the new artifacts are uploaded. If you have already fetched the ozone-2.1.0-RC2 tag or downloaded the tarballs, please* re-fetch/re-download* to ensure you are verifying the latest version with the fixes included. [1] https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/9432 [2] https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/9443 Regards, Chung-En Fabian Morgan <[email protected]> 於 2025年12月6日週六 上午4:01寫道： > Hi all, > > I'm a new contributor to Ozone working on STS feature. I recently opened > two PRs: 1) https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/9434 for master and 2) > https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/9443 for ozone-2.1 release branch. > These are cherry-picks of the same commit from > https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/9214 which is in a feature branch. > > This commit adds a new method to IAccessAuthorizer interface that Ranger > team needs to implement for STS (and also adds another attribute to > RequestContext class). Would it be possible to include it in Ozone 2.1 > since it will almost be released? These interface modifications > *shouldn't* > change (especially since a prototype was already done), but I can't > guarantee if the Ranger side may want to tweak something or not. It > doesn't seem like there should be any changes though. > > It would be great to know what the upstream community thinks! Thanks! > > Fabian > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 4:54 AM Attila Doroszlai <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Some recent issues we found: > > > HDDS-13978 > > > HDDS-13844 > > > > HDDS-13978 doesn't sound like a blocker and HDDS-13844 is not a new > > regression in 2.1.0. > > > > It's ultimately Chung En's call, but IMO we shouldn't delay the > > release of 2.1.0 for these bugs. This is already the third RC and it > > was up for vote for 11 days. > > > > 2.1.1 can be started soon afterwards. > > > > -Attila > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
