+1 (binding)

* Checksums and signature good.
* License notice good.
* ASF Headers good.
* Can compile good.

Best,
Jingsong

On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 3:38 PM Yunfeng Zhou
<flink.zhouyunf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I have checked:
>
> * Download links are valid.
> * Checksums and signatures are right.
> * LICENSE/NOTICE files exist.
> * No unexpected binary files.
> * All source files have ASF headers.
> * Can compile from source.
>
> Best,
> Yunfeng
>
> > 2025年6月20日 22:10,yu zelin <yuzelin....@gmail.com> 写道:
> >
> > Hello Paimon Devs,
> >
> > Kindly request the devs review and vote for releasing Paimon 1.2.0.
> >
> > The official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/paimon/paimon-1.2.0-rc3/
> >
> > This source release has been signed with a PGP available here (
> > yuzelin....@gmail.com):
> >
> >
> > https://downloads.apache.org/paimon/KEYS
> >
> > All artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository:
> >
> > (Note: orgapachepaimon-1106 contains flink-2.0 and paimon-iceberg related
> > components.)
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepaimon-1112/
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepaimon-1113/
> >
> > Git branch for the release:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/paimon/tree/release-1.2.0-rc3
> >
> > Please download, verify, and test.
> >
> > The VOTE will pass after 3 binding approve.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > To learn more about apache paimon, please see https://paimon.apache.org/
> > To learn about how to verify a Paimon release, please see Verifying a
> > Paimon Release
> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PAIMON/Verifying+a+Paimon+Release>
> >
> > Checklist for reference:
> >
> > [ ] Download links are valid.
> > [ ] Checksums and signatures.
> > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> > [ ] No unexpected binary files
> > [ ] All source files have ASF headers
> > [ ] Can compile from source
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Zelin Yu
>

Reply via email to