Thanks! Will raise a draft PR for it!

Warm Regards,
Arnav

On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 2:46 PM Jingsong Li <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Arnav,
>
> Sounds good to me!
>
> Best,
> Jingsong
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 4:08 PM Arnav Balyan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jingsong,
> > Thanks for your reply, makes sense. Maybe to start with, this could be a
> > simple non-invasive comment from the bot to nudge the author and reviewer
> > about the stale activity. The maintainer could decide what to do next. If
> > we see this working well, potentially automated in the future. What do
> you
> > think?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Arnav
> >
> > On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 8:45 AM Jingsong Li <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Arnav for starting this discussion.
> > >
> > > +1 to "marking a PR as inactive after 3 months of no activity, with 1
> > > warning at 2 months to inform the author."
> > >
> > > Perhaps we won't automatically close it for now. If there is a PR that
> > > can be automatically closed, we can manually check and close it.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jingsong
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 11:29 AM Arnav Balyan <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi team,
> > > >
> > > > I noticed that we have several open PRs from a few years ago that
> have
> > > not
> > > > seen activity in a long time. It can make it harder to tell which
> PRs are
> > > > currently active and ready for review, and may add maintenance
> overhead.
> > > >
> > > > Would it make sense to introduce a stale PR policy? For example,
> marking
> > > a
> > > > PR as inactive after 3 months of no activity, with 1 warning at 2
> months
> > > to
> > > > inform the author that it would be auto closed if there is no
> response.
> > > >
> > > > Contributors could always reopen their PR if they plan to continue
> the
> > > > work. This could make the project more clear/friendly for newcomers
> and
> > > > reduce maintenance overhead for maintainers.
> > > >
> > > > Would love to know what you think.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Arnav
> > >
>

Reply via email to