Thanks for raising this.

My understanding is that this proposal applies to IVF in general. It
focuses on index building and query-time pruning for IVF-sharded layouts,
so it should also be applicable to other IVF-based index types.

We plan to support IVF_PQ first, and then extend it to other IVF indexes
later. I'll also update the wording in PIP-47 accordingly.

Best,
zhoufa

Jingsong Li <[email protected]> 于2026年8月28日周五 13:29写道:

> +1 for this.
>
> Is this only for PQ? Do you think it's possible to apply it to IVF-RQ?
>
> Best,
> Jingsong
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 12:25 PM 周伐 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > I'd like to initiate a discussion on PIP-47: Centroid-Based Sharding
> Design
> > for IVF_PQ [1].
> >
> > Paimon already supports IVF_PQ for vector search, but query-time pruning
> > for centroid-based layouts is still limited. As a result, queries may
> read
> > shards that are not actually relevant. This proposal introduces a
> > routing-based pruning mechanism to narrow the search to relevant shards
> and
> > improve query efficiency.
> >
> > Looking forward to hearing from you, thanks
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/PAIMON/pages/444334660/PIP-47+Centroid-Based+Sharding+Design+for+IVF_PQ
> >
> > Best,
> > zhoufa
>

Reply via email to