Thanks for raising this. My understanding is that this proposal applies to IVF in general. It focuses on index building and query-time pruning for IVF-sharded layouts, so it should also be applicable to other IVF-based index types.
We plan to support IVF_PQ first, and then extend it to other IVF indexes later. I'll also update the wording in PIP-47 accordingly. Best, zhoufa Jingsong Li <[email protected]> 于2026年8月28日周五 13:29写道: > +1 for this. > > Is this only for PQ? Do you think it's possible to apply it to IVF-RQ? > > Best, > Jingsong > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 12:25 PM 周伐 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi devs, > > > > I'd like to initiate a discussion on PIP-47: Centroid-Based Sharding > Design > > for IVF_PQ [1]. > > > > Paimon already supports IVF_PQ for vector search, but query-time pruning > > for centroid-based layouts is still limited. As a result, queries may > read > > shards that are not actually relevant. This proposal introduces a > > routing-based pruning mechanism to narrow the search to relevant shards > and > > improve query efficiency. > > > > Looking forward to hearing from you, thanks > > > > [1] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/PAIMON/pages/444334660/PIP-47+Centroid-Based+Sharding+Design+for+IVF_PQ > > > > Best, > > zhoufa >
