+1

On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 10:52 AM Jingsong Li <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 5:05 PM yu zelin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Zelin Yu
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 2:55 PM Nicholas Jiang <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1(binding).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Nicholas Jiang
> > >
> > > On 2026/09/15 05:40:54 lining jing wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Please review and vote on Apache Paimon Vector Index 0.5.0,
> > > > release candidate 2.
> > > >
> > > > Compared with RC1, this candidate upgrades crossbeam-epoch from 0.9.18
> > > > to 0.9.20 to fix RUSTSEC-2026-0204 and refreshes the four Rust 
> > > > dependency
> > > > inventories. There are no other source changes.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Approve
> > > > [ ]  0 No opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not approve (please explain)
> > > >
> > > > Source candidate (the artifact being voted on):
> > > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/paimon/paimon-vector-index-0.5.0-rc2/
> > > >
> > > > Git tag:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/paimon-vector-index/releases/tag/v0.5.0-rc2
> > > >
> > > > Commit:
> > > > 31d6b1a1b7b7819a2192ecda634e9fd83b03459c
> > > >
> > > > KEYS:
> > > > https://downloads.apache.org/paimon/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Signing key fingerprint:
> > > > 9704CBEADA409B70AA17C5F40CB1DED081489A3C
> > > >
> > > > Java convenience artifacts (closed staging repository):
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepaimon-1203/
> > > >
> > > > Python convenience artifacts:
> > > > https://test.pypi.org/project/paimon-vindex/0.5.0rc2/
> > > >
> > > > Verification guide:
> > > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/paimon-vector-index/blob/v0.5.0-rc2/docs/verifying-a-release-candidate.html
> > > >
> > > > Release build:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/paimon-vector-index/actions/runs/34924813326
> > > >
> > > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks to everyone who reviews and votes.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Jerry
> > > >
> > >

Reply via email to